• Login
    View Item 
    •   UCrea
    • UCrea Investigación
    • Departamento de Derecho Público
    • D07 Artículos
    • View Item
    •   UCrea
    • UCrea Investigación
    • Departamento de Derecho Público
    • D07 Artículos
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The M/V “Louisa” case: Spain and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

    View/Open
    MVLouisaCase.pdf (308.0Kb)
    Identificadores
    URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10902/7908
    DOI: 10.1703/sybil.18.9
    ISSN: 2211-6125
    Compartir
    RefworksMendeleyBibtexBase
    Estadísticas
    View Usage Statistics
    Google Scholar
    Full record
    Show full item record
    Author
    Ojinaga Ruiz, María del RosarioAutoridad Unican
    Date
    2014
    Derechos
    (c) Koninklijke Brill NV
    Publicado en
    SYbIL (2013—2014) 199 – 222
    Publisher
    Brill
    Palabras clave
    International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea
    Detention of vessels
    Coastal State’s rights
    Abstract:
    On 28 May 2013, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea delivered its judgment on The M/V “Louisa” Case between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and the Kingdom of Spain. The Tribunal found that no dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) existed between the Parties at the time of the filing of the Application and that, therefore, it had no jurisdiction ratione materiae to entertain the case. Among other questions, the debates in the M/V “Louisa” Case have contributed to highlighting the disagreement among the members of the Tribunal regarding both the low threshold on prima facie jurisdiction and on exhaustion of prior exchange of views, as applied hitherto by the Tribunal. This is a matter of interest, because they are both prominent rules governing the jurisdiction of the ITLOS. More important, the jurisprudence in the M/V “Louisa” Case is now relied by the ITLOS as evidenced in the M/V “Virginia G” Case, while completed with more explicit pronunciations about the burden and standard of proof on the existence of and abuse of rights under Article 300, necessarily in connection with the exercise of the rights, jurisdiction and freedoms recognized by the UNCLOS.
    Collections to which it belong
    • D07 Artículos [328]

    UNIVERSIDAD DE CANTABRIA

    Repositorio realizado por la Biblioteca Universitaria utilizando DSpace software
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Metadatos sujetos a:licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 3.0 España
     

     

    Browse

    All of UCreaCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    About UCrea
    What is UcreaGuide of self-archivingThesis archiveOpen accessCopyright guideInstitutional policy
    Thinks in open
    Piensa en abierto
    Share

    UNIVERSIDAD DE CANTABRIA

    Repositorio realizado por la Biblioteca Universitaria utilizando DSpace software
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Metadatos sujetos a:licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 3.0 España