Propensity score matching and persistence correction to reduce bias incomparative effectiveness: the effect of cinacalcet use on all-causemortality
View/ Open
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10902/29155DOI: 10.1002/pds.3789
ISSN: 1099-1557
ISSN: 1053-8569
Full record
Show full item recordAuthor
Iain A. Gillespie; Jürgen Floege; Ioanna Gioni; Tilman B. Drüeke; Martín de Francisco Hernández, Ángel Luis
Date
2014Derechos
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Publicado en
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2014, 24, 738-747
Publisher
Wiley
Palabras clave
Bias
Cinacalcet
Haemodialysis
Mortality
Persistence
Pharmacoepidemiology
Abstract:
Purpose: The generalisability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) may be limited by restrictive entry criteria or by their experimental nature. Observational research can provide complementary findings but is prone to bias. Employing propensity score matching, to reduce such bias, we compared the real-life effect of cinacalcet use on all-cause mortality (ACM) with findings from the Evaluation of Cinacalcet Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events (EVOLVE) RCT in chronic haemodialysis patients.
Methods: Incident adult haemodialysis patients receiving cinacalcet, recruited in a prospective observational cohort from 2007-2009 (AROii; n = 10,488), were matched to non-exposed patients regardless of future exposure status. The effect of treatment crossover was investigated with inverse probability of censoring weighted and lag-censored analyses. EVOLVE ACM data were analysed largely as described for the primary composite endpoint.
Results: AROii patients receiving cinacalcet (n = 532) were matched to 1790 non-exposed patients. The treatment effect of cinacalcet on ACM in the main AROii analysis (hazard ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.35]) was closer to the null than for the Intention to Treat (ITT) analysis of EVOLVE (0.94 [95%CI 0.85-1.04]). Adjusting for non-persistence by 0- and 6-month lag-censoring and by inverse probability of censoring weight, the hazard ratios in AROii (0.76 [95%CI 0.51-1.15], 0.84 [95%CI 0.60-1.18] and 0.79 [95%CI 0.56-1.11], respectively) were comparable with those of EVOLVE (0.82 [95%CI 0.67-1.01], 0.83 [95%CI 0.73-0.96] and 0.87 [95%CI 0.71-1.06], respectively).
Conclusions: Correcting for treatment crossover, we observed results in the 'real-life' setting of the AROii observational cohort that closely mirrored the results of the EVOLVE RCT. Persistence-corrected analyses revealed a trend towards reduced ACM in haemodialysis patients receiving cinacalcet therapy.
Collections to which it belong
- D22 Artículos [655]