Agreement among Mediterranean Diet Pattern Adherence Indexes: MCC-Spain Study
EstadísticasView Usage Statistics
Full recordShow full item record
AuthorOlmedo-Requena, Rocío; González-Donquiles, Carmen; Dávila-Batista, Verónica; Romaguera, Dora; Castelló, Adela; Molina de la Torre, Antonio José; Amiano, Pilar; Dierssen Sotos, Trinidad; Guevara, Marcela; Fernández-Tardón, Guillermo; Lozano-Lorca, Macarena; Alguacil, Juan; Peiró, Rosana; Huerta, José María; Gracia-Lavedan, Esther; Aragonés, Nuria; Fernández-Villa, Tania; Solans, Marta; Gómez Acebo, Inés; [et al.]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution(CC BY) license.
Nutrients. 2019 Feb 26;11(3). pii: E488
Enlace a la publicación
Mediterranean Diet Pattern
There are many different methods used to measure the degree of adherence to a Mediterranean diet (MD), limiting comparison and interpretation of their results. The concordance between different methodologies has been questioned and their evaluation recommended. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement among five indexes that measure adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern. The study population included healthy adults selected in the Multi-Case Control Spain (MCC-Spain) study recruited in 12 provinces. A total of 3640 controls were matched to cases by age and sex. To reach the aim, the following scores of adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern were calculated: Mediterranean diet score (MDS), alternative Mediterranean diet (aMED), relative Mediterranean diet (rMED), dietary score (DS) and literature-based adherence score (LBAS). The relative frequency of subjects with a high level of adherence to a MD varied from 22% (aMED index) to 37.2% (DS index). Similarly, a high variability was observed for the prevalence of a low level of MD: from 24% (rMED) to 38.4% (aMED). The correlation among MDS, aMED and rMED indexes was moderate, except for MDS and aMED with a high coefficient of correlation 0.75 (95% CI 0.74?0.77). The Cohen's Kappa coefficient among indexes showed a moderate?fair concordance, except for MDS and aMED with a 0.56 (95% CI 0.55?0.59) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.66?0.68) using linear and quadratic weighting, respectively. The existing MD adherence indexes measured the same, although they were based on different constructing algorithms and varied in the food groups included, leading to a different classification of subjects. Therefore, concordance between these indexes was moderate or low.
Collections to which it belong
- D06 Artículos