Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartínez Camino, Gonzalo 
dc.contributor.authorPérez Saiz, Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Lavín, Esther 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-20T13:09:01Z
dc.date.available2019-03-20T13:09:01Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1576-4737
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/15927
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Our starting point is the observation that television advertising sometimes attempts to persuade the viewer of the value of a product by showing how useful it will be to him in resolving a problem while, on other occasions, it does this by illustrating how it will help him to construct an identity which will be appreciated by himself and others (in this article, the convention of assuming that the communicator is female and the audience, male, will be followed). In accordance with the reason/tickle theory, the more the advertiser bases her strategy on the utility of the product, the closer her message will be to a prototypical reason ad. In contrast, the more she bases it on the capacity of the product to help the consumer to acquire a glamorous identity, the closer it will be to a prototypical tickle ad. In the first case, the advertisement is intended to address the viewer?s uncertainties directly, informing him efficiently about what is being sold to him and what use or savings it offers him. In the second case, meanwhile, the aim of the advertisement is to transmit the communicative intention of the advertiser and thus capture his attention. It will not, however, resolve the viewer?s uncertainties directly, but will rather base its relevance on its capacity to make him infer an array of weak implicatures which associate the product with a glamorous identity. This paper presents an in-depth analysis of nine advertisements, allowing us to describe in detail some specific cases which respond both to these two prototypes and to various points along the scale between them. The objectives are twofold: First, to offer the researcher a theory which allows him to make a thorough and rigorous analysis of the discursive nature of the television advertisement; and secondly, to use this theory to offer an explanation which responds to these characteristics of the above-mentioned strategies.es_ES
dc.format.extent32 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad Complutense de Madrid. Departamento de Filología Española IIIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International © Universidad Complutense de Madrides_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceCLAC 75 (2018), pp. 229-260es_ES
dc.subject.otherReason advertisinges_ES
dc.subject.otherTickle advertisinges_ES
dc.subject.otherUncertaintyes_ES
dc.subject.otherIdentityes_ES
dc.subject.otherUtilityes_ES
dc.titleUtility and identity: an analysis of two rhetorical strategies in tv advertisinges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.5209/CLAC.61349
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International  © Universidad Complutense de MadridExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International © Universidad Complutense de Madrid