dc.contributor.author | Arroyo Gutiérrez, Alberto | |
dc.contributor.author | Castro Alonso, Pablo Bernardo | |
dc.contributor.author | Martínez Torre, Raquel | |
dc.contributor.author | Mañana Canteli, Mario | |
dc.contributor.author | Madrazo Maza, Alfredo | |
dc.contributor.author | Lecuna Tolosa, Ramón | |
dc.contributor.author | González Diego, Antonio | |
dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Cantabria | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-01T16:29:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-01T16:29:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-12 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1996-1073 | |
dc.identifier.other | IPT-2011-1447-920000 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.other | ENE2013-42720-R | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10902/9743 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents the steady and dynamic thermal balances of an overhead power line proposed by CIGRE (Technical Brochure 601, 2014) and IEEE (Std.738, 2012) standards. The estimated temperatures calculated by the standards are compared with the averaged conductor temperature obtained every 8 min during a year. The conductor is a LA 280 Hawk type, used in a 132-kV overhead line. The steady and dynamic state comparison shows that the number of cases with deviations to conductor temperatures higher than 5 ∘ C decreases from around 20% to 15% when the dynamic analysis is used. As some of the most critical variables are magnitude and direction of the wind speed, ambient temperature and solar radiation, their influence on the conductor temperature is studied. Both standards give similar results with slight differences due to the different way to calculate the solar radiation and convection. Considering the wind, both standards provide better results for the estimated conductor temperature as the wind speed increases and the angle with the line is closer to 90 ∘ . In addition, if the theoretical radiation is replaced by that measured with the pyranometer, the number of samples with deviations higher than 5 ∘ C is reduced from around 15% to 5% | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Spanish Government under the R+D initiative INNPACTO with reference IPT-2011-1447-920000 and Spanish R+D initiative with reference ENE2013-42720-R. The authors would also like to acknowledge Viesgo for its support. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 12 p. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
dc.rights | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | Energies 2015, 8(12), 13660-13671 | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Thermal rating | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Ampacity | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Overhead line temperature | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Weather parameters | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Real-time monitoring | es_ES |
dc.title | Comparison between IEEE and CIGRE thermal behaviour standards and measured temperature on a 132-kV overhead power line | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.DOI | 10.3390/en81212391 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | es_ES |