Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorLópez Morinigio, JD
dc.contributor.authorAyesa Arriola, Rosa 
dc.contributor.authorTorres Romano, B
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, AC
dc.contributor.authorShetty, H.
dc.contributor.authorBroadbent, M.
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez Ballesteros, ME
dc.contributor.authorStewart, R.
dc.contributor.authorDavid, AS
dc.contributor.authorDutta, R.
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-13T10:55:56Z
dc.date.available2016-10-13T10:55:56Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/9271
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate the role of risk assessment in predicting suicide in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) receiving secondary mental healthcare. We postulated that risk assessment plays a limited role in predicting suicide in these patients. Design: Retrospective case–control study. Setting: Anonymised electronic mental health record data from the South London and Maudsley National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust (SLaM) (London, UK) linked with national mortality data. Participants: In 242 227 SLaM service users up to 31 December 2013, 635 suicides were identified. 96 (15.1%) had a SSD diagnosis. Those who died before 1 January 2007 (n=25) were removed from the analyses. Thus, 71 participants with SSD who died from suicide over the study period (cases) were compared with 355 controls. Main outcome measure: Risk of suicide in relation to risk assessment ratings. Results: Cases were younger at first contact with services (mean±SD 34.5±12.6 vs 39.2±15.2) and with a higher preponderance of males (OR=2.07, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.65, p=0.01) than controls. Also, suicide occurred within 10 days after last contact with services in half of cases, with the most common suicide methods being hanging (14) and jumping (13). Cases were more likely to have the following ‘risk assessment’ items previously recorded: suicidal history (OR=4.42, 95% CI 2.01 to 9.65, p<0.001), use of violent method (OR=3.37, 95% CI 1.47 to 7.74, p=0.01), suicidal ideation (OR=3.57, 95% CI 1.40 to 9.07, p=0.01) and recent hospital discharge (OR=2.71, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.28, p=0.04). Multiple regression models predicted only 21.5% of the suicide outcome variance. Conclusions: Predicting suicide in schizophrenia is highly challenging due to the high prevalence of risk factors within this diagnostic group irrespective of outcome, including suicide. Nevertheless, older age at first contact with mental health services and lack of suicidal history and suicidal ideation are useful protective markers indicative of those less likely to end their own lives.es_ES
dc.format.extent10 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group Ltdes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 3.0 Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceBMJ Open. 2016 Sep 27;6(9):e011929es_ES
dc.subject.otherRisk assessmentes_ES
dc.subject.otherSchizophreniaes_ES
dc.subject.otherSecondary mental healthcarees_ES
dc.subject.otherSuicidees_ES
dc.titleRisk assessment and suicide by patients with schizophrenia in secondary mental healthcare: a case-control studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011929
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Atribución-NoComercial 3.0 EspañaExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial 3.0 España