Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorGonzález Viar, Marta 
dc.contributor.authorDíez Montero, Rubén 
dc.contributor.authorMolinos Senante, María
dc.contributor.authorDe Florio, Loredana
dc.contributor.authorEsteban García, Ana Lorena 
dc.contributor.authorSala Garrido, Ramón
dc.contributor.authorHernández Sancho, Francesc
dc.contributor.authorTejero Monzón, Iñaki 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-27T08:41:50Z
dc.date.available2016-01-27T08:41:50Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-03
dc.identifier.issn1744-9006
dc.identifier.issn1573-062X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/7967
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT:In the context of the EU Water Framework Directive, a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) was performed to compare centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment strategies aimed to improve the ecological status of a Spanish river. The implementation of several hybrid membrane bioreactors within the urban framework for sewer mining (SM) was compared with the more common wastewater treatment plant enlargement option. The assessment ranked 6 alternatives based on 12 potential scenarios, aimed at narrowing the uncertainty of the CEA. The cost analysis illustrated that SM is the most expensive option regarding both investment and operation and maintenance costs. However, the effectiveness of the alternatives evaluated depends significantly on the scenarios considered, being SM the most effective in most cases. Finally, the cost-effectiveness ratio showed SM as the best cost-effective alternative. CEA provides an ecological-economic indicator useful to prioritize wastewater treatment alternatives to achieve a given objective.es_ES
dc.format.extent28 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherTaylor & Francises_ES
dc.rights© Taylor & Francis . "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Urban Water Journal on January , 2016, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1573062X.2014.991742."es_ES
dc.sourceUrban Water Journal, Vol. 13, No.3, (April 2016), p. 321-330es_ES
dc.subject.otherCost-effectiveness analysises_ES
dc.subject.otherHybrid membrane bioreactores_ES
dc.subject.otherSewer mininges_ES
dc.subject.otherEconomicses_ES
dc.subject.otherDecentralized wastewater treatmentes_ES
dc.titleCost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sewer Mining versus Centralized Wastewater Treatment: Case Study of Arga River Basin (Spain)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttp://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1573062X.2014.991742es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1080/1573062X.2014.991742
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo