• Mi UCrea
    Ver ítem 
    •   UCrea
    • UCrea Investigación
    • Departamento de Derecho Público
    • D07 Artículos
    • Ver ítem
    •   UCrea
    • UCrea Investigación
    • Departamento de Derecho Público
    • D07 Artículos
    • Ver ítem
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The M/V “Louisa” case: Spain and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

    Ver/Abrir
    MVLouisaCase.pdf (308.0Kb)
    Identificadores
    URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10902/7908
    DOI: 10.1703/sybil.18.9
    ISSN: 2211-6125
    Compartir
    RefworksMendeleyBibtexBase
    Estadísticas
    Ver Estadísticas
    Google Scholar
    Registro completo
    Mostrar el registro completo DC
    Autoría
    Ojinaga Ruiz, RosarioAutoridad Unican
    Fecha
    2014
    Derechos
    (c) Koninklijke Brill NV
    Publicado en
    SYbIL (2013—2014) 199 – 222
    Editorial
    Brill
    Palabras clave
    International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea
    Detention of vessels
    Coastal State’s rights
    Resumen/Abstract
    On 28 May 2013, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea delivered its judgment on The M/V “Louisa” Case between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and the Kingdom of Spain. The Tribunal found that no dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) existed between the Parties at the time of the filing of the Application and that, therefore, it had no jurisdiction ratione materiae to entertain the case. Among other questions, the debates in the M/V “Louisa” Case have contributed to highlighting the disagreement among the members of the Tribunal regarding both the low threshold on prima facie jurisdiction and on exhaustion of prior exchange of views, as applied hitherto by the Tribunal. This is a matter of interest, because they are both prominent rules governing the jurisdiction of the ITLOS. More important, the jurisprudence in the M/V “Louisa” Case is now relied by the ITLOS as evidenced in the M/V “Virginia G” Case, while completed with more explicit pronunciations about the burden and standard of proof on the existence of and abuse of rights under Article 300, necessarily in connection with the exercise of the rights, jurisdiction and freedoms recognized by the UNCLOS.
    Colecciones a las que pertenece
    • D07 Artículos [397]

    UNIVERSIDAD DE CANTABRIA

    Repositorio realizado por la Biblioteca Universitaria utilizando DSpace software
    Contacto | Sugerencias
    Metadatos sujetos a:licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 España
     

     

    Listar

    Todo UCreaComunidades y coleccionesFecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosTemasEsta colecciónFecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosTemas

    Mi cuenta

    AccederRegistrar

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas
    Sobre UCrea
    Qué es UcreaGuía de autoarchivoArchivar tesisAcceso abiertoGuía de derechos de autorPolítica institucional
    Piensa en abierto
    Piensa en abierto
    Compartir

    UNIVERSIDAD DE CANTABRIA

    Repositorio realizado por la Biblioteca Universitaria utilizando DSpace software
    Contacto | Sugerencias
    Metadatos sujetos a:licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 España