| dc.contributor.author | Fernández Polanco, José Manuel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mueller, Simone | |
| dc.contributor.author | Luna Sotorrío, Ladislao | |
| dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Cantabria | es_ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-08T12:22:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-07-08T12:22:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1540-8906 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10902/6501 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In a market survey that presented claims for safety, health benefits and sustainability in different combinations for wild and farmed seabream, the main conclusions pointed to a strong preference for wild domestic seabream, although price gave farmed fish an edge. The price differential could be offset by greater emphasis on local production, sustainability or health benefits. A local marketing strategy may yield greater returns tan one focused overseas. | es_ES |
| dc.format.extent | 1 p. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Global Aquaculture Alliance | es_ES |
| dc.rights | © Global Aquaculture Alliance | es_ES |
| dc.source | Global Aquaculture Advocate. Vol. 13, nº 1, 2010. pp. 50-51 | es_ES |
| dc.title | Survey suggests successful claims for seabream marketing. | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | es_ES |