Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorFernández Cobos, Raúl 
dc.contributor.authorVielva Martínez, Patricio 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez González, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorTucci, M.
dc.contributor.authorCruz Rodríguez, Marcos 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-08T11:06:16Z
dc.date.available2014-05-31T03:00:04Z
dc.date.issued2013-11
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711
dc.identifier.issn1365-2966
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/4534
dc.description.abstractRecent results of the ESA Planck satellite have confirmed the existence of some anomalies in the statistical distribution of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. One of the most intriguing anomalies is the cold spot, first detected in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) data by Vielva et al. In a later paper, Vielva et al. (2011) developed a method to probe the anomalous nature of the cold spot by using the cross-correlation of temperature and polarization of the CMB fluctuations. Whereas this work was built under the assumption of analysing full-sky data, in this paper we extend such approach to deal with realistic data sets with a partial-sky coverage. In particular, we exploit the radial and tangential polarization patterns around temperature spots. We explore the capacity of the method to distinguish between a standard Gaussian CMB scenario and an alternative one, in which the cold spot arises from a physical process that does not present correlated polarization features (e.g. topological defects), as a function of the instrumental-noise level. Moreover, we consider more in detail the case of an ideal noise-free experiment and the ones with the expected instrumental-noise levels in QUIJOTE and Planck experiments. We also present an application to the 9-year WMAP data, without being able to obtain firm conclusions, with a significance level of 32 per cent. In the ideal case, the alternative scenario could be rejected at a significance level of around 1 per cent, whereas for expected noise levels of QUIJOTE and Planck experiments the corresponding significance levels are 1.5 and 7.4 per cent, respectively.es_ES
dc.format.extent7 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
dc.publisherRoyal Astronomical Societyes_ES
dc.rights© 2013 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society*
dc.sourceMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 435, Iss. 4, Pp. 3096-3102. (2013)es_ES
dc.subject.otherMethods: data analysises_ES
dc.subject.otherCosmic background radiationes_ES
dc.titleUsing CMB polarization to constrain the anomalous nature of the Cold Spot with an incomplete-sky coveragees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1505es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1093/mnras/stt1505
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES
dc.date.embargoEndDate2014-05-31


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo