| dc.contributor.author | Dominguez Esteban, Mario | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Fernandez Guzman, Ester | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Ramos Barselo, Enrique Alejandro | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Herrero Blanco, Ernesto | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Zubillaga Guerrero, Sergio | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Ballestero Diego, Roberto | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Fernández Flórez, Alejandro | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Gómez Román, José Javier | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Garcia Herrero, Jaime | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Sanchez Gil, Marina | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Velilla Diez, Guillermo | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Campos Juanatey, Felix | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | García Unzueta, María Teresa | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Gutierrez Baños, Jose Luis | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Cantabria | es_ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-03T10:55:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-03T10:55:32Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2688-4526 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10902/39104 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: The integration of blood-based biomarkers and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been proposed to improve prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. However, few validated models combine both tools to support risk-adapted clinical decision-making.
Objective: The study's aim is to evaluate and internally validate a multivariable model integrating clinical, analytical and imaging parameters-including the Prostate Health Index (PHI) and mpMRI-for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve men.
Design setting and participants: This prospective observational study included 183 biopsy-naïve men aged 50-75 years with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/mL and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. All patients underwent PHI testing, and 47.5% received prebiopsy mpMRI. All underwent systematic biopsy; targeted cognitive fusion biopsy was performed for PIRADS ? 3 lesions.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed using PHI, PSA density, PSA free/total ratio, PIRADS score and age. The model was internally validated with bootstrap resampling and converted into a clinical nomogram. Diagnostic accuracy (AUC, sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV) was assessed and compared with simplified strategies using PHI or PIRADS alone, as well as a sequential approach (PHI ? PIRADS).
Results and limitations: The model achieved an AUC of 0.841 (95% CI 0.76-0.91), with 100% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity for csPCa in the mpMRI cohort at the optimal 17% risk threshold (65.5 points). It safely avoided 49.4% of biopsies without missing any csPCa cases. Simpler strategies using PHI or PIRADS alone showed lower efficiency, particularly in balancing sensitivity and biopsy reduction. As an additional analysis, the PHI-mpMRI nomogram by Siddiqui et al. (2023) was externally validated in our cohort, confirming robust diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.95). Limitations include the modest size of the mpMRI cohort and the historical nature of recruitment (2014-2018), although PHI and mpMRI remain standard in contemporary practice.
Conclusions: This model accurately predicts csPCa and outperforms individual tools such as PHI or PIRADS alone. Its application may improve diagnostic efficiency and reduce unnecessary procedures. | es_ES |
| dc.format.extent | 8 p. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.source | BJUI compass, 2025, 6(12), e70101 | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | Clinically significant | es_ES |
| dc.title | Multivariable model integrating PHI and mpMRI for detecting csPCa in biopsy-naïve men | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publisherVersion | https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70101 | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.DOI | 10.1002/bco2.70101 | es_ES |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | es_ES |