Square kilometre array science data challenge 3a: foreground removal for an EoR experiment
Ver/ Abrir
Registro completo
Mostrar el registro completo DCAutoría
Bonaldi, A.; Hartley, P.; Braun, R.; Purser, S.; Acharya, A.; Ahn, K.; Aparicio Resco, M.; Bait, O.; Bianco, M.; Chakraborty, A.; Chapman, E.; Chatterjee, S.; Chege, K.; Chen, H.; Chen, X.; Cruz Rodríguez, Marcos
; Ruiz Granda, Miguel; Herranz Muñoz, Diego
; Remazeilles, Mathieu
; [et al.]Fecha
2025-10Derechos
Attribution 4.0 International
Publicado en
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2025, 543(2), 1092-1119
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Enlace a la publicación
Resumen/Abstract
We present and analyse the results of the Science Data Challenge 3a (SDC3a, https://sdc3.skao.int/challenges/foregrounds), an epoch of reionization (EoR) foreground-removal exercise organized by the Square Kilometre Array Observatory (SKAO) on SKA simulated data. The challenge ran for 8 months, from 2023 March to October. Participants were provided with realistic simulations of SKA-Low data between 106 and 196 MHz, including foreground contamination from extragalactic and Galactic emission, instrumental, and systematic effects. They were asked to deliver cylindrical power spectra of the EoR signal, cleaned from all corruptions, and the corresponding confidence levels. Here, we describe the approaches taken by the 17 teams that completed the challenge, and we assess their performance using different metrics. The challenge results provide a positive outlook on the capabilities of current foreground-mitigation approaches to recover the faint EoR signal from SKA-Low observations. The median error committed in the EoR power spectrum recovery is below the true signal for seven teams, although in some cases, there are some significant outliers. The smallest residual overall is 4.2+20-4.2 × 10-4 K2h-3cMpc3 across all considered scales and frequencies. The estimation of confidence levels provided by the teams is overall less accurate, with the true error being typically underestimated, sometimes very significantly. The most accurate error bars account for 60 ± 20 per cent of the true errors committed. The challenge results provide a means for all teams to understand and improve their performance. This challenge indicates that the comparison between independent pipelines could be a powerful tool to assess residual biases and improve error estimation.
Colecciones a las que pertenece
- D15 Artículos [893]
- D15 Proyectos de Investigación [187]
- D52 Artículos [1421]
- D52 Proyectos de investigación [458]







