Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorMusy Palacio, Fabián
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Imedio, Rafael 
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Uribe, Inmaculada 
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Sainz de Aja, Alfredo 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-22T10:45:05Z
dc.date.available2025-07-22T10:45:05Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-12
dc.identifier.issn0360-3199
dc.identifier.issn1879-3487
dc.identifier.otherPID2021- 123120OB-I00es_ES
dc.identifier.otherTED2021-129951B-C21es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/36815
dc.description.abstractThe road-transport is one of the major contributors to greenhouse global gas (GHG) emissions, where hydrogen (H2) combustion engines can play a crucial role in the path towards the sector's decarbonization goal. This study focuses on comparing the performance and emissions of port-fuel injection (PFI) and direct injection (DI), in a spark ignited combustion engine when is fuelled by hydrogen and other noteworthy fuels like methane and coke oven gas (COG). Computational fluid dynamic simulations are performed at optimal spark advance and air-fuel ratio (^) for engine speeds between 2000 and 5000 rpm. Analysis reveals that brake power increases by 40% for DI, attributed to 30.6% enhanced volumetric efficiency, while the sNOx are reduced by 36% compared to PFI at optimal (^) = 1.5 for hydrogen. Additionally, H2 results in 71.8% and 67.2% reduction in fuel consumption compared to methane and COG respectively, since the H2 lower heating value per unit of mass is higher.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the European Project HYLANTIC EAPA_204/2016, which is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in the framework of the INTERREG ATLANTIC program. The Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation is also supporting this investigation through the projects PID2021-123120OB-I00, TED2021-129951B–C21, and “Complementary Plan for Energy and Renewable Hydrogen” additionally supported with funding from European Union NextGenerationEU (PRTR-C17. I1) and by Comunidad Aut´onoma de Cantabria.es_ES
dc.format.extent14 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevier Ltdes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 137, 925-938es_ES
dc.subject.otherInternal combustion enginees_ES
dc.subject.otherHydrogenes_ES
dc.subject.otherDirect injectiones_ES
dc.subject.otherPort-fuel injectiones_ES
dc.subject.otherCFD simulationes_ES
dc.subject.otherHydrogen combustiones_ES
dc.titleHydrogen-fuelled internal combustion engines: direct injection versus port-fuel injectiones_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.136es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/INTERREG ATLANTIC AREA/EAPA_204%2F2016/Atlantic network for renewable generation and supply of hydrogen to promote high energy efficiency/HYLANTIC/es_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.136
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International