dc.contributor.author | Musy Palacio, Fabián | |
dc.contributor.author | Ortiz Imedio, Rafael | |
dc.contributor.author | Ortiz Uribe, Inmaculada | |
dc.contributor.author | Ortiz Sainz de Aja, Alfredo | |
dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Cantabria | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-22T10:45:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-22T10:45:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-06-12 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0360-3199 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1879-3487 | |
dc.identifier.other | PID2021-
123120OB-I00 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.other | TED2021-129951B-C21 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10902/36815 | |
dc.description.abstract | The road-transport is one of the major contributors to greenhouse global gas (GHG) emissions, where hydrogen (H2) combustion engines can play a crucial role in the path towards the sector's decarbonization goal. This study focuses on comparing the performance and emissions of port-fuel injection (PFI) and direct injection (DI), in a spark ignited combustion engine when is fuelled by hydrogen and other noteworthy fuels like methane and coke oven gas (COG). Computational fluid dynamic simulations are performed at optimal spark advance and air-fuel ratio (^) for engine speeds between 2000 and 5000 rpm. Analysis reveals that brake power increases by 40% for DI, attributed to 30.6% enhanced volumetric efficiency, while the sNOx are reduced by 36% compared to PFI at optimal (^) = 1.5 for hydrogen. Additionally, H2 results in 71.8% and 67.2% reduction in fuel consumption compared to methane and COG respectively, since the H2 lower heating value per unit of mass is higher. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research was supported by the European Project HYLANTIC EAPA_204/2016, which is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in the framework of the INTERREG ATLANTIC program. The Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation is also supporting this investigation through the projects PID2021-123120OB-I00, TED2021-129951B–C21, and “Complementary Plan for Energy and Renewable Hydrogen” additionally supported with funding from European Union NextGenerationEU (PRTR-C17. I1) and by Comunidad Aut´onoma de Cantabria. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 14 p. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | es_ES |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 137, 925-938 | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Internal combustion engine | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Hydrogen | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Direct injection | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Port-fuel injection | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | CFD simulation | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Hydrogen combustion | es_ES |
dc.title | Hydrogen-fuelled internal combustion engines: direct injection versus port-fuel injection | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherVersion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.136 | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/INTERREG ATLANTIC AREA/EAPA_204%2F2016/Atlantic network for renewable generation and supply of hydrogen to promote high energy efficiency/HYLANTIC/ | es_ES |
dc.identifier.DOI | 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.136 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | es_ES |