Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorFortea Ormaechea, José Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorAlvarado-Tapias, Edilmar
dc.contributor.authorSimbrunner, Benedikt
dc.contributor.authorEzcurra, Iranzu
dc.contributor.authorHernánez-Gea, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorAracil, Carles
dc.contributor.authorLlop, Elba
dc.contributor.authorPuente Sánchez, Ángela María
dc.contributor.authorRoig, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorReiberger, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Pagan, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorCalleja, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorFerrero-Gregori, Andreu
dc.contributor.authorMandorfer, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorVillanueva, Candid
dc.contributor.authorCrespo, Javier
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-10T07:57:17Z
dc.date.issued2025-07
dc.identifier.issn0168-8278
dc.identifier.issn1600-0641
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/36646
dc.description.abstractBackground & Aims: Data on the effectiveness of classical non-selective beta-blockers (cNSBBs, i.e., propranolol and nadolol) vs. carvedilol in patients with cirrhosis are scarce. In the present study, we aimed to compare their potential for preventing decompensation and mortality in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study including patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis with clinically significant portal hypertension, undergoing measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) to assess acute hemodynamic response to intravenous propranolol (i.e., HVPG decrease 10% from baseline value) prior to primary prophylaxis for variceal bleeding. Outcomes were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting in a competitive risk framework. Results: A total of 540 patients were included, 256 with compensated (cNSBBs n = 111; carvedilol n = 145) and 284 with decompensated (cNSBBs n = 134; carvedilol n = 150) cirrhosis. Median follow-up was 36.3 (IQR 16.9-61.0) and 30.7 (IQR 13.1-52.2) months, respectively. After covariate balancing, compared to cNSBBs, carvedilol significantly reduced the risk of a first decompensation in compensated patients (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.61; 95% CI 0.41-0.92; p = 0.019) and a combined endpoint of further decompensation/death in decompensated patients (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.57; 95% CI 0.42-0.77; p <0.0001). A second HVPG was conducted on 176 (68.8%, compensated) and 177 (62.3%, decompensated) patients. Acute non-responders, both compensated (11.1% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.422) and decompensated (16.0% vs. 43.6%: p = 0.0247) patients, showed a higher likelihood of achieving a chronic hemodynamic response with carvedilol. The safety profile of each type of NSBB was comparable in both cohorts. Conclusions: Our data endorse the current recommendation favoring the use of carvedilol for the prevention of a first decompensation of cirrhosis and suggest extending the recommendation to patients with decompensated cirrhosis without recurrent or refractory ascites.es_ES
dc.format.extent11 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rights© 2025. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceJournal of Hepatology, 2025, 83(1), 70-80es_ES
dc.subject.otherLiver Cirrhosises_ES
dc.subject.otherPortal hypertensiones_ES
dc.subject.otherNadololes_ES
dc.subject.otherNon-selective beta-blockeres_ES
dc.titleCarvedilol vs. propranolol for the prevention of decompensation and mortality in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.12.017es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsembargoedAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.jhep.2024.12.017
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES
dc.embargo.lift2026-08-01
dc.date.embargoEndDate2026-08-01


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© 2025. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2025. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license