Carvedilol vs. propranolol for the prevention of decompensation and mortality in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis
Ver/ Abrir
Registro completo
Mostrar el registro completo DCAutoría
Fortea Ormaechea, José Ignacio; Alvarado-Tapias, Edilmar; Simbrunner, Benedikt; Ezcurra, Iranzu; Hernánez-Gea, Virginia; Aracil, Carles; Llop, Elba; Puente Sánchez, Ángela María; Roig, Cristina; Reiberger, Thomas; García-Pagan, Juan Carlos; Calleja, José Luis; Ferrero-Gregori, Andreu; Mandorfer, Matthias; Villanueva, Candid; Crespo, JavierFecha
2025-07Derechos
© 2025. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
Publicado en
Journal of Hepatology, 2025, 83(1), 70-80
Editorial
Elsevier
Disponible después de
2026-08-01
Enlace a la publicación
Palabras clave
Liver Cirrhosis
Portal hypertension
Nadolol
Non-selective beta-blocker
Resumen/Abstract
Background & Aims: Data on the effectiveness of classical non-selective beta-blockers (cNSBBs, i.e., propranolol and nadolol) vs. carvedilol in patients with cirrhosis are scarce. In the present study, we aimed to compare their potential for preventing decompensation and mortality in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis.
Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study including patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis with clinically significant portal hypertension, undergoing measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) to assess acute hemodynamic response to intravenous propranolol (i.e., HVPG decrease 10% from baseline value) prior to primary prophylaxis for variceal bleeding. Outcomes were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting in a competitive risk framework.
Results: A total of 540 patients were included, 256 with compensated (cNSBBs n = 111; carvedilol n = 145) and 284 with decompensated (cNSBBs n = 134; carvedilol n = 150) cirrhosis. Median follow-up was 36.3 (IQR 16.9-61.0) and 30.7 (IQR 13.1-52.2) months, respectively. After covariate balancing, compared to cNSBBs, carvedilol significantly reduced the risk of a first decompensation in compensated patients (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.61; 95% CI 0.41-0.92; p = 0.019) and a combined endpoint of further decompensation/death in decompensated patients (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.57; 95% CI 0.42-0.77; p <0.0001). A second HVPG was conducted on 176 (68.8%, compensated) and 177 (62.3%, decompensated) patients. Acute non-responders, both compensated (11.1% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.422) and decompensated (16.0% vs. 43.6%: p = 0.0247) patients, showed a higher likelihood of achieving a chronic hemodynamic response with carvedilol. The safety profile of each type of NSBB was comparable in both cohorts.
Conclusions: Our data endorse the current recommendation favoring the use of carvedilol for the prevention of a first decompensation of cirrhosis and suggest extending the recommendation to patients with decompensated cirrhosis without recurrent or refractory ascites.
Colecciones a las que pertenece
- D22 Artículos [1134]