Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorDahl, Martin
dc.contributor.authorLavery, Paul S.
dc.contributor.authorMazarrasa Elosegui, Ines
dc.contributor.authorSamper-Villareal, Jimena
dc.contributor.authorAdame, Maria Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorCrooks, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Carlos M.
dc.contributor.authorFriess, Daniel A.
dc.contributor.authorKrause-Jensen, Dorte
dc.contributor.authorLeiva Dueñas, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorLovelock, Catherine E.
dc.contributor.authorMacreadie, Peter I.
dc.contributor.authorMasqué, Pere
dc.contributor.authorMateo, Miguel Ángel
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Óscar
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-31T14:36:26Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-21
dc.identifier.issn2590-3330
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/36141
dc.description.abstractBlue carbon (BC) habitats (e.g., mangroves, tidal marshes, and seagrasses) are important CO2 sinks but are among the most threatened ecosystems on Earth. Substantial research over the last decade has quantified BC to evaluate the climate benefits associated with habitat conservation and restoration. However, the exponential growth in BC science has resulted in differing approaches that hinder comparison across studies and increase uncertainty. Here, we synthesized existing data to depict the range of uncertainty associated to different BC methodologies and argue that cumulative biases linked to multiple methodologies can result in BC estimates differing by up to 10-fold. We identified 14 common research procedures that can be improved to strengthen BC biophysical assessments and support implementation of BC projects, and outlined good practices to align research with policy, management, and ethical values. Standardization of practices will help generate high-quality BC projects that can deliver multiple co-benefits for humans and the environment.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe wish to thank Nu´ria Marba` for input and feedback on earlier versions of the manuscript. We also thank the five anonymous reviewers for providing their feedback on ways to improve the manuscript. This work was supported by I + D + i projects RYC2019-027073-I, PIE HOLOCENO 20213AT014 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER, and MEDCHANGE funded by AEI. Funding was provided to M.D. by the Foundation for Baltic and East European studies (grant no. 21-PD2-0002). D.K.-J. was supported by OBAMA-NEXT (grant agreement no. 101081642) funded by the European Union under the Horizon Europe program. P.I.M. acknowledges the support of an Australian Research Council discovery grant (DP200100575). I.M. was supported by a Juan de la Cierva Incorporacio´ n postdoctoral fellowship of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (JC2020-045917-I). The International Atomic Energy Agency is grateful to the Government of the Principality of Monaco for the support provided to its IAEA Marine Environment Laboratories.es_ES
dc.format.extent18 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherCell Presses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceOne Earth, 2025, 8, 101175es_ES
dc.titleRecommendations for strengthening blue carbon sciencees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsembargoedAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101175
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES
dc.embargo.lift2026-03-21
dc.date.embargoEndDate2026-03-21


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International