Recommendations for strengthening blue carbon science
Ver/ Abrir
Registro completo
Mostrar el registro completo DCAutoría
Dahl, Martin; Lavery, Paul S.; Mazarrasa Elosegui, Ines; Samper-Villareal, Jimena; Adame, Maria Fernanda; Crooks, Stephen; Duarte, Carlos M.; Friess, Daniel A.; Krause-Jensen, Dorte; Leiva Dueñas, Carmen; Lovelock, Catherine E.; Macreadie, Peter I.; Masqué, Pere; Mateo, Miguel Ángel; Serrano, ÓscarFecha
2025-03-21Derechos
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Publicado en
One Earth, 2025, 8, 101175
Editorial
Cell Press
Disponible después de
2026-03-21
Resumen/Abstract
Blue carbon (BC) habitats (e.g., mangroves, tidal marshes, and seagrasses) are important CO2 sinks but are
among the most threatened ecosystems on Earth. Substantial research over the last decade has quantified
BC to evaluate the climate benefits associated with habitat conservation and restoration. However, the exponential growth in BC science has resulted in differing approaches that hinder comparison across studies and increase uncertainty. Here, we synthesized existing data to depict the range of uncertainty associated to
different BC methodologies and argue that cumulative biases linked to multiple methodologies can result in BC estimates differing by up to 10-fold. We identified 14 common research procedures that can be improved to strengthen BC biophysical assessments and support implementation of BC projects, and outlined good practices to align research with policy, management, and ethical values. Standardization of practices will help generate high-quality BC projects that can deliver multiple co-benefits for humans and the environment.
Colecciones a las que pertenece
- D56 Artículos [333]