Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorPérez Martín, Álvaro 
dc.contributor.authorLópez Lanza, José Ramón
dc.contributor.authorBustamante Odriozola, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Revilla, José Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorAgüeros-Fernández, María José
dc.contributor.authorPérez Guijarro, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorOlmos Martínez, José Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Taboada, Víctor Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorHernández Hernández, José Luis 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-28T14:31:30Z
dc.date.available2025-03-28T14:31:30Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1889-836X
dc.identifier.issn2173-2345
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/36116
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: we aimed to analyze whether the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to a decrease in denosumab (Dmab) adherence in the population, and assess the incidence of subsequent fractures in non-adherent patients. Methods: we assessed all patients who should have required the administration of a dose of Dmab in Cantabria (Spain), during the lockdown Sociodemographic variables, risk factors for osteoporosis, data on Dmab administration, and the reason for drug discontinuation were collected. Furthermore, the development of a subsequent clinical fracture during the following year was also analyzed. Results: a total of 2948 patients should have received a new dose of Dmab during the lockdown months, but 546 (18.5 %) discontinued the drug. The main reason for withdrawal was the patient's own doing (65 %). The incidence of clinical fractures in the overall group was low (n = 45; 1.46 %) with only 4 vertebral and 3 hip fractures being reported. When the group that did not receive more doses of Dmab or an alternate antiosteoporotic agent was analyzed (n = 147), it was revealed that 2 patients (1.36 %) sustained a vertebral fracture and another one (0.68 %) a hip fracture during the year following the last dose of the drug. Conclusions: there was a non-negligible percentage of patients who did not receive the dose of Dmab on time during the lockdown period. However, the incidence of clinical vertebral and non-vertebral fractures was low, even in the non-compliant subjects who did not receive a different antiosteoporotic agent. None of the patients sustained multiple vertebral fractures at the 1-year follow-up.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding: some of the patients included who participated in the Camargo Cohort Study received a grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI21/00532) co-funded by FEDER funds provided by the European Union.es_ES
dc.format.extent8 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSociedad Española de Investigaciones Óseas y Metabolismo Minerales_ES
dc.rights© Sociedad Española de Investigaciones Óseas y Metabolismo Minerales_ES
dc.sourceRevista de Osteoporosis y Metabolismo Mineral, 2024, 16(3), 71-78es_ES
dc.subject.otherDenosumabes_ES
dc.subject.otherAdherencees_ES
dc.subject.otherOsteoporosises_ES
dc.subject.otherFractureses_ES
dc.titleAdherence to denosumab during the COVID-19 pandemices_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.20960/revosteoporosmetabminer.00045es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.20960/revosteoporosmetabminer.00045
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo