dc.contributor.author | Calderón-Parra, Jorge | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Grillo, Sara | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Muñoz, Patricia | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Machado-Vilchez, Marina | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Delgado-Montero, Antonia | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | De Alarcón-González, Arístides | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Poyato-Borrego, Manuel | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Goenega-Sánchez, M. A. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Fariñas Álvarez, María del Carmen | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Miró, José M. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | López-Cortés, Luis Eduardo | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez-García, Raquel | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Oteo, José A. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Martínez-Ramos, Antonio | es_ES |
dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Cantabria | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-06T07:47:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-06T07:47:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0163-4453 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10902/35899 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of antistaphylococcal penicillin (ASP) or cephazolin-based combinations versus monotherapy in patients with native-valve infective endocarditis (IE) caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA).
Methods: Post-hoc analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort. We include patients from 2008 to 2022 with definite native-valve, left-side IE due to MSSA treated primarily with ASP/cephazolin. Patients were categorized according to whether they initially received monotherapy or combination therapy for more than 72 h. A propensity score-matched cohort was planned.
Results: Out of 420 included cases, 94 (22.4%) received monotherapy and 326 (77.6%) combination. Median combination duration was 14 days (interquartile range 10?20).
Sixty-eight combination cases were matched with 68 monotherapy controls. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. There were no differences in in-hospital or one-year mortality between groups (OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.33-2.18 and HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.35-1.31, respectively). Endocarditis relapses and persistent bacteraemia rates were similar (0% vs 1.5%, p = 1.000; and 19.1% vs 13.2%, p = 0.352, respectively). Drug-related adverse events were more frequent in the combination group (15.0% vs 1.1%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Antibiotic combinations for patients with native valve left-sided MSSA endocarditis did not improve patient's outcomes. Drug-related adverse events were more frequent in combination patients. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 8 p. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.rights | © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | Journal of Infection, 2024, 89(6), 106352 | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Infective endocarditis | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Staphylococcus aureus | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Combination therapy | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Prognosis | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Mortality | es_ES |
dc.title | Efficacy and safety of antistaphylococcal penicillin or cephazolin-based combinations versus monotherapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: a propensity score analysis of nationwide prospective cohort | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherVersion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106352 | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.DOI | 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106352 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.other | Infective endocarditis | es_ES |
dc.description.other | Staphylococcus aureus | es_ES |
dc.description.other | Combination therapy | es_ES |
dc.description.other | Prognosis | es_ES |
dc.description.other | Mortality | es_ES |