Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorCalderón-Parra, Jorgees_ES
dc.contributor.authorGrillo, Saraes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Patriciaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMachado-Vilchez, Marinaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDelgado-Montero, Antoniaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDe Alarcón-González, Arístideses_ES
dc.contributor.authorPoyato-Borrego, Manueles_ES
dc.contributor.authorGoenega-Sánchez, M. A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorFariñas Álvarez, María del Carmen es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMiró, José M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Cortés, Luis Eduardoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-García, Raqueles_ES
dc.contributor.authorOteo, José A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Ramos, Antonioes_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-06T07:47:57Z
dc.date.available2025-03-06T07:47:57Z
dc.date.issued2024es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0163-4453es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/35899
dc.description.abstractObjectives: We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of antistaphylococcal penicillin (ASP) or cephazolin-based combinations versus monotherapy in patients with native-valve infective endocarditis (IE) caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Methods: Post-hoc analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort. We include patients from 2008 to 2022 with definite native-valve, left-side IE due to MSSA treated primarily with ASP/cephazolin. Patients were categorized according to whether they initially received monotherapy or combination therapy for more than 72 h. A propensity score-matched cohort was planned. Results: Out of 420 included cases, 94 (22.4%) received monotherapy and 326 (77.6%) combination. Median combination duration was 14 days (interquartile range 10?20). Sixty-eight combination cases were matched with 68 monotherapy controls. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. There were no differences in in-hospital or one-year mortality between groups (OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.33-2.18 and HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.35-1.31, respectively). Endocarditis relapses and persistent bacteraemia rates were similar (0% vs 1.5%, p = 1.000; and 19.1% vs 13.2%, p = 0.352, respectively). Drug-related adverse events were more frequent in the combination group (15.0% vs 1.1%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Antibiotic combinations for patients with native valve left-sided MSSA endocarditis did not improve patient's outcomes. Drug-related adverse events were more frequent in combination patients.es_ES
dc.format.extent8 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceJournal of Infection, 2024, 89(6), 106352es_ES
dc.subject.otherInfective endocarditises_ES
dc.subject.otherStaphylococcus aureuses_ES
dc.subject.otherCombination therapyes_ES
dc.subject.otherPrognosises_ES
dc.subject.otherMortalityes_ES
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of antistaphylococcal penicillin or cephazolin-based combinations versus monotherapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: a propensity score analysis of nationwide prospective cohortes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106352es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106352es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES
dc.description.otherInfective endocarditises_ES
dc.description.otherStaphylococcus aureuses_ES
dc.description.otherCombination therapyes_ES
dc.description.otherPrognosises_ES
dc.description.otherMortalityes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND licenseExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license