Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorPaz Zulueta, María 
dc.contributor.authorLlorca Díaz, Francisco Javier 
dc.contributor.authorSarabia Lavín, Raquel 
dc.contributor.authorBolumar Montrull, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorRioja, Luis
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, Abrahan
dc.contributor.authorSantibáñez Margüello, Miguel 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-13T13:26:38Z
dc.date.available2025-02-13T13:26:38Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-27
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/35532
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aim: Literature evaluating association between neonatal morbidity and immigrant status presents contradictory results. Poorer compliance with prenatal care and greater social risk factors among immigrants could play roles as major confounding variables, thus explaining contradictions. We examined whether prenatal care and social risk factors are confounding variables in the relationship between immigrant status and neonatal morbidity. Methods: Retrospective cohort study: 231 pregnant African immigrant women were recruited from 2007-2010 in northern Spain. A Spanish population sample was obtained by simple random sampling at 1:3 ratio. Immigrant status (Spanish, Sub-Saharan and Northern African), prenatal care (Kessner Index adequate, intermediate or inadequate), and social risk factors were treated as independent variables. Low birth weight (LBW < 2500 grams) and preterm birth (< 37 weeks) were collected as neonatal morbidity variables. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) were estimated by unconditional logistic regression with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: Positive associations between immigrant women and higher risk of neonatal morbidity were obtained. Crude OR for preterm births in Northern Africans with respect to nonimmigrants was 2.28 (95% CI: 1.04-5.00), and crude OR for LBW was 1.77 (95% CI: 0.74-4.22). However, after adjusting for prenatal care and social risk factors, associations became protective: adjusted OR for preterm birth = 0.42 (95% CI: 0.14-1.32); LBW = 0.48 (95% CI: 0.15-1.52). Poor compliance with prenatal care was the main independent risk factor associated with both preterm birth (adjusted OR inadequate care = 17.05; 95% CI: 3.92-74.24) and LBW (adjusted OR inadequate care = 6.25; 95% CI: 1.28-30.46). Social risk was an important independent risk factor associated with LBW (adjusted OR = 5.42; 95% CI: 1.58-18.62). Conclusions: Prenatal care and social risk factors were major confounding variables in the relationship between immigrant status and neonatal morbidity.es_ES
dc.format.extent12 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencees_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePLoS One, 2015, 10(3), e0120765es_ES
dc.titleThe role of prenatal care and social risk factors in the relationship between immigrant status and neonatal morbidity: a retrospective cohort studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120765es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1371/joumal.pone.0120765
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International