Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorMonforte, V.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorLópez, C.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSantos, F.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorZurbano Goñi, Felipe es_ES
dc.contributor.authorTorre, M. de laes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSole, A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGavalda, J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorUssetti, P.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorLama, R.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCifrián Martínez, José Manuel es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBorro, J. M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorPastor, A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorLen, O.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBravo, C.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorRoman, A.es_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T10:50:53Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T10:50:53Z
dc.date.issued2009es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/35091
dc.description.abstractSeventy-six cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive lung transplant recipients receiving valganciclovir (900 mg/day) for CMV prophylaxis were compared with a group of 87 patients receiving oral ganciclovir (3000 mg/day). Prophylaxis was administered to day 120 post-transplantation and follow-up was 1 year. In addition, a study was conducted on risk factors for CMV infection/disease. CMV disease incidence was 7.9% and 16.1% for valganciclovir and oral ganciclovir, respectively (p = 0.11). Patients receiving valganciclovir had fewer viral syndromes (2.6% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.05), a similar rate of tissue-invasive disease (5.2% vs. 4.6%, p = ns), longer time-to-onset of CMV infection/disease (197.5 vs. 155.2 days, p < 0.05), and a lower probability of infection/disease while on prophylaxis (1.3% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.01). Nonetheless, leukopenia incidence was higher with valganciclovir (15.8% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.01), as was the need for treatment withdrawal due to adverse effects (11.8% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01). CMV infection was similar in both groups (32.9% vs. 34.5%). Induction therapy with basiliximab and glucocorticosteroid treatment were independent risk factors for developing CMV infection/disease. In conclusion, valganciclovir prophylaxis results in a low incidence of CMV disease in lung transplant recipients and appears more effective than oral ganciclovir. Despite the comparatively higher incidence of adverse events with valganciclovir, the drug can be considered safe for prophylaxis.es_ES
dc.format.extent8 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals Inc.es_ES
dc.rightsAlojado según Resolución CNEAI 9/12/24 (ANECA) © 2009 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.es_ES
dc.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2009, 9(5), 1134-1141es_ES
dc.titleA multicenter study of valganciclovir prophylaxis up to day 120 in CMV-seropositive lung transplant recipientses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02574.xes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsclosedAccess
dc.identifier.DOI10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02574.xes_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo