Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorTurakulov, Zafar
dc.contributor.authorKamolov, Azizbek
dc.contributor.authorNorkobilov, Adham
dc.contributor.authorVariny, Miroslav
dc.contributor.authorFallanza Torices, Marcos 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-08T15:51:38Z
dc.date.issued2024-10
dc.identifier.issn0263-8762
dc.identifier.issn1744-3563
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/34144
dc.description.abstractThe cement industry is a major contributor to global carbon emissions and is characterized by high energy waste, necessitating urgent mitigation efforts. This study explores decarbonization pathways, including energy efficiency, clinker substitution, alternative fuels, and carbon capture, storage, and utilization technologies, for a 1 Mt/year cement plant in Uzbekistan. Waste heat recovery and CO2 capture technologies are identified as the most effective methods for this plant because of their high efficiency and sustainability potential. By using modeling tools such as Aspen Plus and Aspen Custom Modeler, various scenarios, including the cement plant baseline, amine-based CO2 absorption, membrane CO2 separation, and WHR units, are investigated to assess their techno-economic and environmental impacts. The study establishes design parameters for each unit and calculates both capital and operational costs. Compared with conventional amine absorption, the membrane separation process reduces the clinker cost, levelized cost of clinker, CO2 avoided cost, and CO2 capture cost by 31%, 34.3%, 72%, and 70%, respectively. The implementation of a waste heat recovery system with amine absorption and membrane separation further reduces annual indirect CO2 emissions by 17% and 35%, respectively, thereby lowering operating costs. Membrane separation systems prove to be more economical in terms of both capital and operational expenses, particularly when integrated with heat recovery systems, effectively offsetting the higher costs associated with amine-based systems.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was partially supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (grant no. APVV-18–0134 and APVV-19–0170). In addition, the authors acknowledge the collaboration between the University of Cantabria and Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, as well as the national scholarship program of the Slovak Republic for providing an opportunity to carry out this study.es_ES
dc.format.extent29 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rights© 2024, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivadaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceChemical Engineering Research and Design, 2024, 210, 625-637es_ES
dc.subject.otherCement industryes_ES
dc.subject.otherDecarbonizationes_ES
dc.subject.otherCO2 capturees_ES
dc.subject.otherMembrane separationes_ES
dc.subject.otherCost analysises_ES
dc.subject.otherWaste heates_ES
dc.titleTechno-economic and environmental analysis of decarbonization pathways for cement plants in Uzbekistanes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2024.09.003es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsembargoedAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.cherd.2024.09.003
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES
dc.embargo.lift2026-11-01
dc.date.embargoEndDate2026-11-01


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© 2024, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivadaExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2024, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada