Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorCobo Gutiérrez, Selene 
dc.contributor.authorNegri, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorValente, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorReiner, David M.
dc.contributor.authorHamelin, Lorie
dc.contributor.authorMac Dowell, Niall
dc.contributor.authorGuillén Gosálbez, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-12T17:06:36Z
dc.date.available2024-09-12T17:06:36Z
dc.date.issued2023-02
dc.identifier.issn1748-9326
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/33798
dc.description.abstractMost climate change mitigation scenarios restricting global warming to 1.5 °C rely heavily on negative emissions technologies and practices (NETPs). Here we updated previous literature reviews and conducted an analysis to identify the most appealing NETPs. We evaluated 36 NETPs configurations considering their technical maturity, economic feasibility, greenhouse gas removal potential, resource use, and environmental impacts. We found multiple trade-offs among these indicators, which suggests that a regionalised portfolio of NETPs exploiting their complementary strengths is the way forward. Although no single NETP is superior to the others in terms of all the indicators simultaneously, we identified 16 Pareto-efficient NETPs. Among them, six are deemed particularly promising: forestation, soil carbon sequestration (SCS), enhanced weathering with olivine and three modalities of direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS). While the co-benefits, lower costs and higher maturity levels of forestation and SCS can propel their rapid deployment, these NETPs require continuous monitoring to reduce unintended side-effects—most notably the release of the stored carbon. Enhanced weathering also shows an overall good performance and substantial co-benefits, but its risks—especially those concerning human health—should be further investigated prior to deployment. DACCS presents significantly fewer side-effects, mainly its substantial energy demand; early investments in this NETP could reduce costs and accelerate its scale-up. Our insights can help guide future research and plan for the sustainable scale-up of NETPs, which we must set into motion within this decade.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 869192 (NEGEM).es_ES
dc.format.extent38 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherInstitute of Physics Publishinges_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceEnvironmental Research Letters, 2023, 18(2), 023001es_ES
dc.subject.otherNegative emissions technologieses_ES
dc.subject.otherCarbon dioxide removales_ES
dc.subject.otherGreenhouse gas removales_ES
dc.subject.otherSustainabilityes_ES
dc.subject.otherScale-upes_ES
dc.titleSustainable scale-up of negative emissions technologies and practices: where to focuses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acacb3es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1088/1748-9326/acacb3
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International