dc.contributor.author | Rábago Gómez, Daniel | |
dc.contributor.author | Fernández López, Enrique | |
dc.contributor.author | Celaya Gonzalez, Santiago | |
dc.contributor.author | Fuente Merino, Ismael | |
dc.contributor.author | Fernández Villar, Alicia | |
dc.contributor.author | Quindós López, Jorge | |
dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez, Raúl | |
dc.contributor.author | Quindós Poncela, Luis Santiago | |
dc.contributor.author | Sainz Fernández, Carlos | |
dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Cantabria | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-27T14:59:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-27T14:59:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1424-8220 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10902/32937 | |
dc.description.abstract | A comparison of low-cost radon monitors was conducted at the Laboratory of Natural Radiation (LNR). The monitors we evaluated were EcoQube, RadonEye, RadonEye Plus2, Spirit, ViewPlus, ViewRadon and WavePlus. An AlphaGUARD monitor calibrated at the Laboratory of Environmental Radioactivity of the University of Cantabria (LaRUC), accredited for testing and calibration according to ISO/IEC 17025, provided the reference value of radon concentration. The temporal stability of the monitors was studied, obtaining a percentage of missing records ranged from 1% to 19% of the data. The main technical characteristics studied were temporal stability, measurement ranges, accuracy, correlation and response time. The main results show that the measurement ranges align with those specified by their manufacturers, with percentage differences with respect to the reference monitor of between 5% and 16%. The diversity found for response time is remarkable, with values ranging from 1 to 15 h, with Pearson correlation factors between 0.63 and 0.90. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Funding: This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments: Authors would like to express their gratitude to the National Uranium Company of Spain (ENUSA Industrias Avanzadas) for the collaboration given during all these years. The cooperation of the staff of Saelices el Chico center was essential to carry out this research. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 14 p. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
dc.rights | © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | Sensors, 2024, 24(6), 1836 | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Response time | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Intercomparison | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Low-cost radon monitor | es_ES |
dc.title | Investigation of the performance of various low-cost radon monitors under variable environmental conditions | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.DOI | 10.3390/s24061836 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | es_ES |