dc.contributor.author | Álvarez Cuesta, Moisés | |
dc.contributor.author | Toimil Silva, Alexandra | |
dc.contributor.author | Losada Rodríguez, Iñigo | |
dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Cantabria | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-25T13:01:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-25T13:01:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-03 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1748-9326 | |
dc.identifier.other | PID2021-126506OB-100 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.other | MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER
UE; TED2021-131885B-100 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10902/32682 | |
dc.description.abstract | Shoreline predictions are essential for coastal management. In this era of increasing amounts of
data from different sources, it is imperative to use observations to ensure the reliability of shoreline
forecasts. Data assimilation has emerged as a powerful tool to bridge the gap between episodic and
imprecise spatiotemporal observations and the incomplete mathematical equations describing the
physics of coastal dynamics. This research seeks to maximize this potential by assessing the
effectiveness of different data assimilation algorithms considering different observational data
characteristics and initial system knowledge to guide shoreline models towards delivering results as
close as possible to the real world. Two statistical algorithms (stochastic ensemble and extended
Kalman filters) and one variational algorithm (4D-Var) are incorporated into an equilibrium
cross-shore model and a one-line longshore model. A twin experimental procedure is conducted to
determine the observation requirements for these assimilation algorithms in terms of accuracy,
length of the data collection campaign and sampling frequency. Similarly, the initial system
knowledge needed and the ability of the assimilation methods to track the system nonstationarity
are evaluated under synthetic scenarios. The results indicate that with noisy observations, the
Kalman filter variants outperform 4D-Var. However, 4D-Var is less restrictive in terms of initial
system knowledge and tracks nonstationary parametrizations more accurately for cross-shore
processes. The findings are demonstrated at two real beaches governed by different processes with
different data sources used for calibration. In this contribution, the coastal processes assimilated
thus far in shoreline modelling are extended, the 4D-Var algorithm is applied for the first time in
the field of shoreline modelling, and guidelines on which assimilation method can be most
beneficial in terms of the available observational data and system knowledge are provided.. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 13 p. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Institute of Physics Publishing | es_ES |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | Environmental Research Letters, 2024, 19, 044023 | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Shoreline prediction | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Data assimilation | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Remote sensing | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Climate change | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | 4D-Var | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Kalman filter | es_ES |
dc.title | Which data assimilation method to use and when: unlocking the potential of observations in shoreline modelling | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherVersion | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad3143 | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ad3143 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | es_ES |