Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorBialek, Lukasz
dc.contributor.authorFrankiewicz, Mikolaj
dc.contributor.authorAdamowicz, Jan
dc.contributor.authorCampos Juanatey, Felix 
dc.contributor.authorCocci, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorMantica, Guglielmo
dc.contributor.authorRosenbaum, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorVerla, Wesley
dc.contributor.authorWaterloos, Marjan
dc.contributor.authorVetterlein, Malte W.
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T15:11:44Z
dc.date.available2024-04-12T15:11:44Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2080-4806
dc.identifier.issn2080-4873
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/32571
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) is the gold standard treatment in cases of moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence in males. Cuff erosions are one of the most important distant complications of AUS implantation. The optimal urethral management has still not been established. Material and methods: Search terms related to 'urethral stricture', 'artificial urinary sphincter', and 'cuff erosion' were used in the PubMed database to identify relevant articles. Results: In this mini review we identified 6 original articles that assessed the urethral management after AUS explantation due to cuff erosion and included urinary diversion by transurethral and/or suprapubic catheterization, urethrorrhaphy, and in situ urethroplasty. We summarized the results of different management methods and their efficacy in terms of preventing urethral stricture formation. We highlight the need for better-quality evidence on this topic. Conclusions: The available data do not provide a clear answer to the question of optimal urethral management during AUS explantation. There is a great need to provide higher-quality evidence on this topic.es_ES
dc.format.extent3 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPolish Urological Associationes_ES
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.sourceCentral European Journal of Urology, 2023, 76, 322-324es_ES
dc.subject.otherUrethral stricturees_ES
dc.subject.otherArtificial urinary sphincteres_ES
dc.subject.otherCuff erosiones_ES
dc.subject.otherUrinary incontinencees_ES
dc.titleUrethral management after artificial urinary sphincter explantation due to cuff erosiones_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.5173/ceju.2023.132
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).