Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Gutiérrez, José Alberto 
dc.contributor.authorMieites Alonso, Verónica
dc.contributor.authorPardo Franco, Arturo 
dc.contributor.authorLópez Higuera, José Miguel 
dc.contributor.authorConde Portilla, Olga María 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T15:14:06Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T15:14:06Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-11
dc.identifier.issn0277-786X
dc.identifier.issn1996-756X
dc.identifier.otherPID2019-107270RB-C21es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/32218
dc.description.abstractProfilometry is the technique that estimates the surface height and tomography of a sample. This technique is crucial to correct the intensity variations and angle changes when optical properties of a sample are estimated and its calculation depends on the surface profile. Two systems have been evaluated in this work: an Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) system and a Spatial-Frecuency Domain Imaging (Hyperspectral-SFDI) system made up of a rotating mirror hyperspectral camera and a Red-Green-Blue (RGB) projector. The estimation of the height map with the OCT system based on the high contrasted backscattering of the air-sample interface whereas, while with the HSI-SFDI system the Phase Shifting Profilometry (PSP) technique has been implemented employing different frequencies. This work compares both approaches and evaluates the differences between them.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSupport for this work was provided by the projects PREVAL 21/07 (FUSIOMUSCLE), SUBVTC-2021-0038 (HYPERfusionTRANS), EQC 2019-006589-P, DTS22/00127 (hyPERfusioCAM), DTS17-00055 (INTRACARDIO) and DISFOS (PID2019-107270RB-C21 /AEI/10.13039/501100011033), financed by the ISCIII, the Fundación Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL) and the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, co-financed with FEDER funds.es_ES
dc.format.extent4 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSPIE Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineerses_ES
dc.rights© 2023 Society of Photo Optical Instrumentation Engineers. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic reproduction and distribution, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper are prohibited.es_ES
dc.sourceProceedings of SPIE, 2023, 12627, 126271Pes_ES
dc.sourceTranslational Biophotonics: Diagnostics and Therapeutics III, Munich, Germany, 2023es_ES
dc.subject.otherSFDIes_ES
dc.subject.otherOCTes_ES
dc.subject.otherPSPes_ES
dc.subject.otherHyperspectrales_ES
dc.subject.otherHeight mapes_ES
dc.subject.otherSurface profilees_ES
dc.subject.otherProfilometryes_ES
dc.titleComparison between optical coherence tomography and phase shifting profilometry for surface estimationes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectes_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1117/12.2670564es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1117/12.2670564
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo