Grip strength, neurocognition, and social functioning in people witht type-2 diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia
Ver/ Abrir
Registro completo
Mostrar el registro completo DCAutoría
Aliño-Dies, María; Sánchez-Ortí, Joan Vicent; Correa-Ghisays, Patricia; Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent; Vila-Francés, Joan; Selva-Vera, Gabriel; Correa-Estrada, Paulina; Forés-Martos, Jaume; San-Martín Valenzuela, Constanza; Monfort-Pañego, Manuel; Ayesa Arriola, Rosa

Fecha
2020Derechos
Attribution 4.0 International. © 2020 The Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Publicado en
Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11, 525231
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Enlace a la publicación
Palabras clave
Frailty
Grip strength
Cognitive performance
Social functioning
Severe mental illness
Type-2 diabetes mellitus
Resumen/Abstract
Background: Frailty is a common syndrome among older adults and patients with several comorbidities. Grip strength (GS) is a representative parameter of frailty because it is a valid indicator of current and long-term physical conditions in the general population and patients with severe mental illnesses (SMIs). Physical and cognitive capacities of people with SMIs are usually impaired; however, their relationship with frailty or social functioning have not been studied to date. The current study aimed to determine if GS is a valid predictor of changes in cognitive performance and social functioning in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus and SMIs.
Methods: Assessments of social functioning, cognitive performance, and GS (measured with an electronic dynamometer) were conducted in 30 outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, 35 with major depressive disorder, 42 with bipolar disorder, 30 with schizophrenia, and 28 healthy controls, twice during 1-year, follow-up period. Descriptive analyses were conducted using a one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables. Differences between groups for the motor, cognitive, and social variables at T1 and T2 were assessed using a one-way analysis of covariance, with sex and age as co-variates (p < 0.01). To test the predictive capacity of GS at baseline to explain the variance in cognitive performance and social functioning at T2, a linear regression analysis was performed (p < 0.05).
Results: Predictive relationships were found among GS when implicated with clinical, cognitive, and social variables. These relationships explained changes in cognitive performance after one year of follow-up; the variability percentage was 67.7%, in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus and 89.1% in patients with schizophrenia. Baseline GS along with other variables, also predicted changes in social functioning in major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia, with variability percentages of 67.3, 36, and 59%, respectively.
Conclusion: GS combined with other variables significantly predicted changes in cognitive performance and social functioning in people with SMIs or type-2 diabetes mellitus. Interventions aimed to improve the overall physical conditions of patients who have poor GS could be a therapeutic option that confers positive effects on cognitive performance and social functioning.
Colecciones a las que pertenece
- D22 Artículos [1093]