Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorGarcía Hoyos, Martaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorHumbert, Ludovices_ES
dc.contributor.authorSalmón, Zaidaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRiancho Moral, José Antonio es_ES
dc.contributor.authorValero Díaz de Lamadrid, Carmen es_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T13:25:12Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T13:25:12Z
dc.date.issued2019es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1862-3522es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1862-3514es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/31229
dc.description.abstractWe analyzed volumetric bone mineral density, by 3D analysis, in 76 people with Down syndrome and 76 controls. People with Down syndrome, particularly men, have a lower hip volumetric bone mineral density than the general population. Besides, volumetric bone mineral density declines more rapidly in Down syndrome. Introduction: People with Down syndrome (DS) have a lower areal bone mineral density (aBMD) estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, they have smaller-sized bones, which could influence the measurements. Therefore, our objective was to determine volumetric BMD in these patients. Materials and methods: We included 76 outpatients with DS and 76 control healthy volunteers matched for age and sex distribution. Clinical data were obtained with a standardized interview and physical exam, including age, sex, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI). aBMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray at the femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH). The 3D-SHAPER® software (version 2.8, Galgo Medical, Barcelona, Spain) was used to derive 3D analysis from participants' hip DXA scans. Results: DS femurs had a similar 3D geometry, compared with the femurs of controls. However, 3D analysis showed that participants with DS had smaller cortical thickness (1.84 mm ± 0.17 vs. 2.02 ± 0.20 mm; p < 0.0001), cortical vBMD (777 ± 49 mg/cm3 vs. 809 ± 43 mg/cm3; p < 0.0001), and cortical sBMD (143 ± 19 mg/cm2 vs. 164 ± 22 mg/cm2; p < 0.0001). After adjustment for age and BMI, all 3D measurements remained lower in DS than in controls. These differences were more marked in men than in women. vBMD decreased with age in controls and DS, but the decline was greater in DS for all 3D parameters. Conclusion: People with DS, particularly men, have a lower hip vBMD than the general population. Besides, vBMD declines more rapidly in DS.es_ES
dc.format.extent19 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rights© 2019. This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature's AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0645-7
dc.sourceArchives of Osteoporosis, 2019, 14(1), 98es_ES
dc.subject.otherVolumetric
dc.subject.otherBone mineral density
dc.subject.other3D modeling
dc.subject.otherOsteoporosis
dc.subject.otherDown
dc.titleAnalysis of volumetric BMD in people with Down syndrome using DXA-based 3D modelinges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0645-7es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.identifier.DOI10.1007/s11657-019-0645-7es_ES
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo