Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorOlmos Martínez, José Manuel es_ES
dc.contributor.authorHernández Hernández, José Luis es_ES
dc.contributor.authorPariente Rodrigo, Emilio Jesús es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Chamorro, María Josefinaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorValero Díaz de Lamadrid, Carmen es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Macías, Jesús es_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T12:57:48Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T12:57:48Z
dc.date.issued2020es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0378-5122es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1873-4111es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/31225
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate trabecular bone score (TBS) in Spanish postmenopausal women from our area. To analyze its relationship with bone mineral density (BMD), bone quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone turnover markers. Study design: A total of 1450 postmenopausal women aged 44-94 (62 ± 10) participated in this cross-sectional study nested in a population-based cohort. BMD and TBS were assessed by DXA. QUS measurements were performed using a Sahara Clinical Sonometer. Serum 25(OH)D, PTH, P1NP, ?-CTX were determined by electrochemiluminescence. Results: Mean TBS of postmenopausal women in our region was 1.341 ± 0.111. Nearly 50 % of them had normal values. Only 11 % had scores compatible with a clearly degraded microarchitecture. TBS decreased with age, correlated negatively with BMI and was lower in current smokers than in non-smokers. An association was observed between TBS and QUS, although the association was weak and lower than that found between TBS and BMD or QUS and BMD. No association was found between TBS and 25(OH)D, PTH or bone turnover markers. Conclusions: Half of postmenopausal women in our region have TBS values that indicate a preserved microarchitecture. Only about 10 % have scores compatible with a clearly degraded microarchitecture. A weak association was observed between TBS and QUS, suggesting that the two techniques capture different aspects of bone microarchitecture. The absence of association with 25(OH)D, PTH, and bone turnover markers may be due to the fact that TBS assesses a specific (mostly trabecular) part of the skeleton, whilst the three serum factors are related to the whole skeleton.es_ES
dc.format.extent6 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevier Science Publisherses_ES
dc.rightsAlojado según Resolución CNEAI 5/12/23 (ANECA)es_ES
dc.rights© Elsevier
dc.sourceMaturitas , 2020, 132, 24-29es_ES
dc.titleTrabecular bone score and bone quantitative ultrasound in spanish postmenopausal women. The Camargo cohort studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.11.008es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsclosedAccess
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.11.008es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo