• Mi UCrea
    Ver ítem 
    •   UCrea
    • UCrea Investigación
    • Departamento de Educación
    • D11 Proyectos de investigación
    • Ver ítem
    •   UCrea
    • UCrea Investigación
    • Departamento de Educación
    • D11 Proyectos de investigación
    • Ver ítem
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    What do stakeholders understand by self-determination? Consensus for its evaluation

    Ver/Abrir
    WhatStakeholdersUnde ... (329.7Kb)
    Identificadores
    URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10902/31068
    DOI: 10.1111/jar.12523
    ISSN: 1360-2322
    Compartir
    RefworksMendeleyBibtexBase
    Estadísticas
    Ver Estadísticas
    Google Scholar
    Registro completo
    Mostrar el registro completo DC
    Autoría
    Vicente, Eva; Guillén-Martín, Verónica MarinaAutoridad Unican; Gómez, Laura Elisabet; Ibáñez García, AlbaAutoridad Unican; Sánchez, Sergio
    Fecha
    2019
    Derechos
    © John Wiley & Sons This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Vicente, E., Guillén, V. M., Gómez, L. E., Ibáñez, A., & Sánchez, S. (2019). What do stakeholders understand by self?determination? Consensus for its evaluation. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32(1), 206-218, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12523. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
    Publicado en
    JARID. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2019, 32(1),206-218
    Editorial
    Wiley-Blackwell
    Palabras clave
    Content validity
    Experts
    Delphi study
    Assessment
    Consensus
    Self-determination
    Resumen/Abstract
    Background: Advances in international studies on self-determination point out the need for continuous efforts to deepen its understanding and implications. The aim of this study is to obtain a comprehensive pool of items to operationalize the self- determination construct that serves as a starting point towards a valid instrument based on the reports of others. Method: We conducted a Delphi study of three rounds involving three panels of ex-perts: ten professionals, five people with intellectual disability and six relatives of people with intellectual disability. Data analysis required both qualitative and quanti-tative methods. Results: The initial pool of 131 items was refined through the different rounds to a final set composed of 115?some were removed and new ones were added. Content- based evidence is provided. In this study, the present authors generated a potential valid pool of items to develop a new measurement tool based on the latest advances on the self- determination theoretical framework. Conclusions: The implications for future research focus on strengthening the knowl-edge of self- determination.
    Colecciones a las que pertenece
    • D11 Artículos [787]
    • D11 Proyectos de investigación [180]

    UNIVERSIDAD DE CANTABRIA

    Repositorio realizado por la Biblioteca Universitaria utilizando DSpace software
    Contacto | Sugerencias
    Metadatos sujetos a:licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 España
     

     

    Listar

    Todo UCreaComunidades y coleccionesFecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosTemasEsta colecciónFecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosTemas

    Mi cuenta

    AccederRegistrar

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas
    Sobre UCrea
    Qué es UcreaGuía de autoarchivoArchivar tesisAcceso abiertoGuía de derechos de autorPolítica institucional
    Piensa en abierto
    Piensa en abierto
    Compartir

    UNIVERSIDAD DE CANTABRIA

    Repositorio realizado por la Biblioteca Universitaria utilizando DSpace software
    Contacto | Sugerencias
    Metadatos sujetos a:licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 España