Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorRojo, Ricardoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCalvo Alén, Jaime es_ES
dc.contributor.authorPrada, Álvaroes_ES
dc.contributor.authorValor, Santiagoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Garbiñees_ES
dc.contributor.authorLópez Hoyos, Marcos es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCervera, Ricardes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Mateos, Palomaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorJurado Roger, Auroraes_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-21T15:00:20Z
dc.date.available2023-12-21T15:00:20Z
dc.date.issued2023es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1568-9972es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1873-0183es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/30931
dc.description.abstractAnti-dsDNA autoantibodies are listed as one of the classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and are relatively effective indicators for monitoring disease activity and treatment response. Therefore, clinicians rely on them to diagnose and adjust medication and treatment strategies for SLE patients. However, the use of anti-dsDNA antibodies is not free from controversy. Part of this controversy stems from the fact that anti-dsDNA antibodies are found in several disorders, besides SLE. In addition to this, anti-dsDNA antibodies are a heterogeneous group of antibodies, and their determination still lacks proper standardization. Moreover, anti-dsDNA testing specificity and diagnostic performance change depending on the population under study. These and other issues result in inconsistency and encumber the clinical use of anti-dsDNA antibodies. A panel of medical laboratory and clinical experts on SLE discussed such issues based on their clinical experience in a first meeting, establishing a series of recommendations. The proceedings of this first meeting, plus an exhaustive review of the literature, were used to compose a paper draft. The panel subsequently discussed and refined this draft in a second meeting, the result of which is this paper. This document is relevant to clinical laboratories as it guides to improving diagnosis and monitoring of SLE. Simultaneously, it will help laboratories compile more informative reports, not limited to a mere number. It is also relevant to clinical doctors who wish to better understand laboratory methods so that they can do a more efficient, better-aimed laboratory test ordering.es_ES
dc.format.extent9 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceAutoimmunity Reviews, 2023, 22, 103479es_ES
dc.subject.otherSystemic lupus erythematosuses_ES
dc.subject.otherDiagnosises_ES
dc.subject.otherFollow-upes_ES
dc.subject.otherAnti-dsDNA autoantibodieses_ES
dc.subject.otherBest practiceses_ES
dc.subject.otherTestinges_ES
dc.subject.otherAdvisory boardes_ES
dc.titleRecommendations for the use of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies in the diagnosis and follow-up of systemic lupus erythematosus - a proposal from an expert paneles_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103479es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103479es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International