Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorSantiago-Setien, Pilares_ES
dc.contributor.authorBarquín-Rego, Cristinaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Martínez, Paulaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorEzquerra-Marigomez, Maríaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Barquín, Martaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMenéndez-Garcia, Cristinaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorUriarte, Fernandoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-López, Yésicaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMisiego, Mercedeses_ES
dc.contributor.authorSánchez de la Torre, José Ramónes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSetién, Soniaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDelgado-Alvarado, Manueles_ES
dc.contributor.authorRiancho Zarrabeitia, Javier es_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-13T16:46:04Z
dc.date.available2023-09-13T16:46:04Z
dc.date.issued2023es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1664-3224es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/29912
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of ocrelizumab in a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) at high risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), previously treated with natalizumab in extending interval dosing (EID), who switched to ocrelizumab and to compare them with patients who continued EID-natalizumab. Thirty MS patients previously treated with natalizumab in EID (every 8 weeks) were included in this observational retrospective cohort study. Among them, 17 patients were switched to ocrelizumab and 13 continued with EID-natalizumab. Except for the John Cunningham virus (JCV) index, no significant differences were detected between both groups. Main outcome measures included: annualized relapse rate (ARR), radiological activity, disability progression, and the NEDA-3 index. Patients were followed for 96 weeks. The median washout period in ocrelizumab-switchers was 6 weeks. Among them, AAR and radiological activity during follow-up were 0.03, without significant differences in comparison with the previous period on natalizumab-EID. The comparison between ocrelizumab-switchers and patients continuing on EID-natalizumab showed no significant differences in AAR, radiological activity, or disability progression. However, the proportion of patients maintaining a NEDA-3 status in week 96 was slightly superior among ocrelizumab-switchers (94 vs 69%). No serious adverse events were observed in any group. In conclusion, switching from EID-natalizumab to ocrelizumab can be considered as a therapeutic option, particularly in patients with MS at high risk of PML, to mitigate the risks of both PML and disease reactivationes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding: This study received funding from IDIVAL (CSI 19/51 and CSI21/73). The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publicationes_ES
dc.format.extent6 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers research foundationes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceFrontiers in Immunology, 2023, 14, 1086028es_ES
dc.subject.otherExtended interval dosinges_ES
dc.subject.otherNatalizumabes_ES
dc.subject.otherOcrelizumabes_ES
dc.subject.otherMultiple sclerosises_ES
dc.subject.otherPML – progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathyes_ES
dc.titleSwitch to ocrelizumab in MS patients treated with natalizumab in extended interval dosing at high risk of PML: A 96-week follow-up pilot studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.3389/fimmu.2023.1086028es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International