Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorMora Cuesta, Víctor Manueles_ES
dc.contributor.authorUssetti, Piedades_ES
dc.contributor.authorPablo, Alicia dees_ES
dc.contributor.authorIturbe Fernández, David es_ES
dc.contributor.authorLaporta, Rosalíaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAlonso, Rodrigoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAguilar, Myriames_ES
dc.contributor.authorQuezada, Carlos A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCifrián Martínez, José Manuel es_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T15:44:10Z
dc.date.available2023-09-12T15:44:10Z
dc.date.issued2023es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2076-2607es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/29874
dc.description.abstractBackground: The clinical benefits of the common off-label use of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific immunoglobulin (CMV-Ig) combined with antivirals in organ transplantation have not been previously assessed. The objective was to compare the risk of CMV infection and other post-transplantation outcomes between two CMV-Ig prophylaxis regimens in lung transplant recipients; Methods: Retrospective study of 124 donor CMV positive/recipient negative (D+/R?) patients receiving preventive ganciclovir/valganciclovir for 12 months, of whom 62 received adjunctive CMV-Ig as per label indication (short regimen [SR-Ig]; i.e., 7 doses over 2.5 months) and were compared to 62 who received an extended off-label regimen (ER-Ig) consisting of 17 doses over one year after transplantation. Results: The incidence of CMV infection or disease, acute rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and survival did not differ between the two CMV-Ig schedules. Although the time to the first CMV infection after transplantation was shorter in the ER-Ig than in the SR-Ig adjunctive group (log-rank: p = 0.002), the risk was independently predicted by antiviral cessation (odds ratio = 3.74; 95% confidence interval = 1.04?13.51; p = 0.030), whereas the CMV-Ig schedule had no effect. Conclusions: Extending the adjunctive CMV-Ig prophylaxis beyond the manufacturer's recommendations up to one year does not confer additional clinical benefits regarding lung post-transplantation outcomes.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding: This research was funded by Medical SLU (Spanish branch of Biotest AG). Acknowledgments: We acknowledge Mònica Gratacòs for providing support in the manuscript preparation and editing.es_ES
dc.format.extent14 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights© 2022 by the authors*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceMicroorganisms, 2023, 11, 32es_ES
dc.subject.otherCytomegaloviruses_ES
dc.subject.otherLung transplantationes_ES
dc.subject.otherCMV infectiones_ES
dc.subject.otherProphylaxises_ES
dc.subject.otherCMV immunoglobulines_ES
dc.subject.otherMorbidityes_ES
dc.subject.otherSurvivales_ES
dc.titleEvaluation of two different CMV-immunoglobulin regimens for combined CMV prophylaxis in high-risk patients following lung transplantes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010032es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.3390/microorganisms11010032es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International