Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorDíaz de Terán López, Teresaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Cacho, Pedroes_ES
dc.contributor.authorFélix, Carlos dees_ES
dc.contributor.authorMacías, Emilioes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCabello Najera, Martaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCantalejo Martín, Olgaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorBanfi, Paoloes_ES
dc.contributor.authorNicolini, Antonelloes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSolidoro, Paoloes_ES
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Martínez, Mónica es_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-06T15:08:33Z
dc.date.available2023-06-06T15:08:33Z
dc.date.issued2022es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/29228
dc.description.abstractBackground: In obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), treatment with mandibular advancement devices (MADs) reduces patients' Apnoea-Hypopnoea index (AHI) scores and improves their sleepiness and quality of life. MADs are non-invasive alternatives for patients who cannot tolerate traditional continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. The variability of responses to these devices makes it necessary to search for predictors of success. The aim of our study was to evaluate the presence of mandibular torus as a predictor of MAD efficacy in OSA and to identify other potential cephalometric factors that could influence the response to treatment. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. The study included 103 patients diagnosed of OSA who met the criteria for initiation of treatment with MAD. Structural variables were collected (cephalometric and the presence or absence of mandibular torus). Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the existence of predictive factors for the efficacy of MADs. Results: A total of 103 patients who were consecutively referred for treatment with MAD were included (89.3% men); the mean age of the participants was 46.3 years, and the mean AHI before MAD was 31.4 (SD 16.2) and post- MAD 11.3 (SD 9.2). Thirty-three percent of patients had mandibular torus. Torus was associated with a better response (odds ratio (OR) = 2.854 (p = 0.035)) after adjustment for sex, age, body mass index (BMI; kg/m2), the angle formed by the occlusal plane to the sella?nasion plane (OCC plane to SN), overinjection, and smoking. No cephalometric predictors of efficacy were found that were predictive of MAD treatment success. Conclusions: The presence of a mandibular torus practically triples the probability of MAD success. This is the simplest examination with the greatest benefits in terms of the efficacy of MAD treatment for OSA.es_ES
dc.format.extent13 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights© 2022 by the authorses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, 19, 14154es_ES
dc.subject.otherObstructive sleep apnoeaes_ES
dc.subject.otherMandibular advancement deviceses_ES
dc.subject.otherCephalometryes_ES
dc.subject.otherMandibular toruses_ES
dc.titleMandibular torus as a new index of success for mandibular advancement deviceses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.3390/ijerph192114154es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International