Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorNiño Zarazúa, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorScaturro, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorJordá, Vanesa 
dc.contributor.authorTarp, Finn
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T09:06:03Z
dc.date.available2023-06-05T09:06:03Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0963-8024
dc.identifier.issn1464-3723
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/29219
dc.description.abstractA strand of the political economy literature emphasizes the effect of income inequality on growth and poverty, which materialises through redistribution. The theoretical expectation postulated by standard economic theory is that high inequality would lead to higher redistribution via the collective action of the median voter. The empirical literature testing the median voter theorem has been conducted in the context of industrialised economies. In this article, we examine the median voter hypothesis with specific reference to SSA, a region characterised by high levels of income inequality and limited redistribution. We adopt an instrumental variable approach to unpack the determinants and plausible mechanisms underpinning this relationship. In the article, we account for the effect of omitted top income earners in income inequality estimates, given their weight in the shape of the income distribution and their influence in redistributive policies. Overall, we find a positive relationship between inequality and redistribution in SSA, especially among middle-income countries. Further examination reveals that the abundance of natural resource rents seems to be the driving force affecting tax policy choices, which in turn exacerbates income inequality and undermines progressive redistribution. Thus, in assessing the relationship between inequality and redistribution, our results do not provide strong evidence to support the propositions of the median voter theorem, but instead, they call for alternative interpretations that seem to align more closely to the existence of multiple steady states.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe are grateful to Théophile Azomahou, Gary Fields, Augustin K. Fosu, Njuguna Ndung’u, Yusi Ouyang, Abebe Shimeles, Erik Thorbecke, and seminar participants at the AERC meeting in November 2019 for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. We are particularly grateful to the African Economic Research Consortium for financial support. Vanesa Jordá acknowledges partial financial support from the Fundación Ramón Areces (CISP20A6658).es_ES
dc.format.extent24 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for the Study of African Economies.es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceJournal of African Economies, 2023, 32(2), 296-319es_ES
dc.subject.otherSSAes_ES
dc.subject.otherTaxationes_ES
dc.subject.otherRedistributiones_ES
dc.subject.otherInequalityes_ES
dc.titleIncome inequality and redistribution in Sub-Saharan Africaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejac053es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1093/jae/ejac053
dc.type.versionsubmittedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for the Study of African Economies.Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for the Study of African Economies.