Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorYoris Nóbile, Adrián Isidro 
dc.contributor.authorLizasoain Arteaga, Esther
dc.contributor.authorSlebi Acevedo, Carlos José
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Fernández, Elena 
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Cañón, Sara 
dc.contributor.authorIndacoechea Vega, Irune 
dc.contributor.authorCastro Fresno, Daniel 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-30T14:28:23Z
dc.date.available2024-06-01T22:57:35Z
dc.date.issued2023-05
dc.identifier.issn2165-0373
dc.identifier.issn2165-0381
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/29149
dc.description.abstractA comparison between low-clinker cement and geopolymer mortars for their application in 3D printing is discussed in this paper. The mortars are composed of materials with low environmental impact, such as cements with low clinker content, by-products of the industry and recycled aggregates. The developed mortars were both mechanically and rheologically characterised. The environmental impact was studied by LCA. To select the most suitable dosages, MCDM analysis was applied based on cost of materials, printability and LCA. Compressive strength was considered as a normalising parameter for both the LCA and cost. The mortars showed good printability and suitable mechanical strength, being higher in the cement mortars. The LCA showed that the geopolymer mortars have a higher environmental impact due to the use of sodium hydroxide. Likewise, MCDM revealed that low-clinker cement mortars are at the top of the ranking, due to a lower environmental impact and lower cost of materials.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg Atlantic Area Programme, under the project 3DPARE (EAPA_174/2016). This work reflects the authors’ opinion, so the authorities of the programme are not responsible for the use of the information here included.es_ES
dc.format.extent52 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherTaylor & Francises_ES
dc.rights© Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscriptes_ES
dc.sourceJournal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2023, 12(5), 609-626es_ES
dc.subject.other3D printinges_ES
dc.subject.otherSustainable mortarses_ES
dc.subject.otherGeopolymerses_ES
dc.subject.otherRecycle aggregateses_ES
dc.subject.otherLife Cycle Assessment (LCA)es_ES
dc.subject.otherMulti-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)es_ES
dc.titleLife cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) analysis to determine the performance of 3D printed cement mortars and geopolymerses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2022.2099479es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1080/21650373.2022.2099479
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo