dc.contributor.author | Fernández-Gorgojo, Mario | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Salas-Gómez, Diana | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Sánchez-Juan, Pascual | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Barbado, David | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Laguna-Bercero, Esther | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Pérez Núñez, María Isabel | es_ES |
dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Cantabria | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-18T13:53:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-18T13:53:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1424-8220 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10902/28963 | |
dc.description.abstract | Ankle fractures can cause significant functional impairment in the short and long term. In
recent years, gait analysis using inertial sensors has gained special relevance as a reliable measurement
system. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in spatiotemporal gait parameters and clinical-
functional measurements in patients with bimalleolar ankle fracture and healthy subjects, to study the
correlation between the different variables, and to analyze the test-retest reliability of a single inertial
sensor in our study population. Twenty-two subjects with bimalleolar ankle fracture six months after
surgery and eleven healthy subjects were included in the study. Spatiotemporal parameters were
analyzed with the G-WALK sensor. Functional scales and clinical measures were collected beforehand.
In the ankle fracture group, the main differences were obtained in bilateral parameters (effect size:
0.61 d 0.80). Between-group differences were found in cadence, speed, stride length, and stride
time (effect size: 1.61 d 1.82). Correlation was moderate (0.436 < r < 0.554) between spatiotemporal
parameters and clinical-functional measures, explaining up to 46% of gait performance. Test-retest
reliability scores were high to excellent (0.84 ICC 0.98), with the worst results in the gait phases.
Our study population presents evident clinicalfunctional impairments 6 months after surgery. The
G-WALK can be considered a reliable tool for clinical use in this population. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 15 p. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights | © 2022 by the authors | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | Sensors 2022, 22, 3050 | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Malleolar fractures | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Inertial sensor unit | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Wearable sensor | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Walking | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Spatiotemporal parameters | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Gait analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Functional scales | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Clinical measurement | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Agreement of measurements | es_ES |
dc.title | Clinical-functional evaluation and test-retest reliability of the G-WALK sensor in subjects with bimalleolar ankle fractures 6 months after surgery | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherVersion | https://doi.org/10.3390/s22083050 | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.DOI | 10.3390/s22083050 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | acceptedVersion | es_ES |