Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorFernández-Gorgojo, Marioes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSalas-Gómez, Dianaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Juan, Pascuales_ES
dc.contributor.authorBarbado, Davides_ES
dc.contributor.authorLaguna-Bercero, Estheres_ES
dc.contributor.authorPérez Núñez, María Isabel es_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-18T13:53:29Z
dc.date.available2023-05-18T13:53:29Z
dc.date.issued2022es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/28963
dc.description.abstractAnkle fractures can cause significant functional impairment in the short and long term. In recent years, gait analysis using inertial sensors has gained special relevance as a reliable measurement system. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in spatiotemporal gait parameters and clinical- functional measurements in patients with bimalleolar ankle fracture and healthy subjects, to study the correlation between the different variables, and to analyze the test-retest reliability of a single inertial sensor in our study population. Twenty-two subjects with bimalleolar ankle fracture six months after surgery and eleven healthy subjects were included in the study. Spatiotemporal parameters were analyzed with the G-WALK sensor. Functional scales and clinical measures were collected beforehand. In the ankle fracture group, the main differences were obtained in bilateral parameters (effect size: 0.61 d 0.80). Between-group differences were found in cadence, speed, stride length, and stride time (effect size: 1.61 d 1.82). Correlation was moderate (0.436 < r < 0.554) between spatiotemporal parameters and clinical-functional measures, explaining up to 46% of gait performance. Test-retest reliability scores were high to excellent (0.84 ICC 0.98), with the worst results in the gait phases. Our study population presents evident clinicalfunctional impairments 6 months after surgery. The G-WALK can be considered a reliable tool for clinical use in this population.es_ES
dc.format.extent15 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights© 2022 by the authorses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceSensors 2022, 22, 3050es_ES
dc.subject.otherMalleolar fractureses_ES
dc.subject.otherInertial sensor unites_ES
dc.subject.otherWearable sensores_ES
dc.subject.otherWalkinges_ES
dc.subject.otherSpatiotemporal parameterses_ES
dc.subject.otherGait analysises_ES
dc.subject.otherFunctional scaleses_ES
dc.subject.otherClinical measurementes_ES
dc.subject.otherAgreement of measurementses_ES
dc.titleClinical-functional evaluation and test-retest reliability of the G-WALK sensor in subjects with bimalleolar ankle fractures 6 months after surgeryes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/s22083050es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.3390/s22083050es_ES
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International