Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorVielva Martínez, Patricio 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez González, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorCruz Rodríguez, Marcos 
dc.contributor.authorBarreiro Vilas, Rita Belén 
dc.contributor.authorTucci Soa, Marco Lorenzo
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-25T09:00:26Z
dc.date.available2023-04-25T09:00:26Z
dc.date.issued2011-01
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711
dc.identifier.issn1365-2966
dc.identifier.otherAYA2007-68058-C03-02.PVes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/28572
dc.description.abstractOne of the most interesting explanations for the non-Gaussian cold spot detected in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) data by Vielva et al. is that it arises from the interaction of the cosmic microwave background radiation with a cosmic texture. In this case, a lack of polarization is expected in the region of the spot, as compared to the typical values associated to large fluctuations of a Gaussian and isotropic random field. In addition, other physical processes related to a non-linear evolution of the gravitational field could lead to a similar scenario. However, some of these alternative scenarios (e.g. a large void in the large-scale structure) have been shown to be very unlikely. In this work we characterize the polarization properties of the cold spot under both hypotheses: a large Gaussian fluctuation and an anomalous feature generated, for instance, by a cosmic texture. We also propose a methodology to distinguish between them, and we discuss its discrimination power as a function of the instrumental noise level. In particular, we address the cases of current experiments, like WMAP and Planck, and others in development as the Q, U and I Joint Tenerife Experiment (QUIJOTE). We find that for an ideal experiment with a high-polarization sensitivity, the Gaussian hypothesis could be rejected at a significance level better than 0.8 per cent. While WMAP is far from providing useful information in this respect, we find that Planck will be able to reach a significance level of around 7 per cent; in addition, we show that the ground-based experiment QUIJOTE could provide a significance level of around 1 per cent, close to the ideal case. If these results are combined with the significance level found for the cold spot in temperature, the capability of QUIJOTE and Planck to reject the alternative hypothesis becomes 0.025 and 0.124 per cent, respectively.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe acknowledge partial financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación project AYA2007-68058-C03-02. PV also thanks financial support from the Ramón y Cajal programme. MT thanks the Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos/World Radiation Center (PMOD/WRC) for having provided him facilities to carry out the investigation. The HEALPIX package was used throughout the data analysis (Górski et al. 2005).es_ES
dc.format.extent6 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
dc.rightsThis article has been accepted for publication in Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, ©2011 RAS. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.es_ES
dc.sourceMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2011, 410(1), 33-38es_ES
dc.subject.otherMethods: data analysises_ES
dc.subject.otherMethods: statisticales_ES
dc.subject.otherCosmology: cosmic background radiationes_ES
dc.titleCosmic microwave background polarization as a probe of the anomalous nature of the cold spotes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17418.xes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17418.x
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo