dc.contributor.author | Fernández Sampedro, Marta | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Sanlés-González, Iria | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | García-Ibarbia, C. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Fañanás-Rodriquez, N. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Fakkas-Fernández, M. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Fariñas Álvarez, María del Carmen | es_ES |
dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Cantabria | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-05T18:26:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-05T18:26:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2334 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10902/28483 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: D-dimer was introduced in 2018 as an alternative biomarker for C-reactive protein (CRP) in the diagnostic of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. We assessed the accuracy of plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of early, delayed, and late PJI according to Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria, and whether persistently high levels of D-dimer in cases of aseptic loosening (AL) may be predictive of subsequent implant-related infection.
Methods: A prospective study of a consecutive series of 187 revision arthroplasties was performed at a single institution.Septic (n = 39) and aseptic revisions (n = 141) were classified based on IDSA criteria. Preoperative assessment of CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and D-dimer was performed. Receiver operating curves were used to determine maximum sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers. The natural progress of D-dimer for AL cases was followed up either until the date of implant-related infection at any time during the first year or 1 year after revision in patients without failure. Clinical outcomes for those AL cases included infection-related failure that required a new surgery or need for antibiotic suppression.
Results: Preoperative D-dimer level was significantly higher in PJI cases than in AL cases (p = 0.000). The optimal threshold of D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI was 1167 ng/mL. For overall diagnosis of PJI, C-reactive protein (CRP) achieved the highest sensitivity (84.6%), followed by erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and D-dimer (82% and 71.8%, respectively). Plasma D-dimer sensitivity was lower for all PJI types. When combinations of 2 tests were studied, the combined use of ESR and CRP achieved the best accuracy for all types of PJI (76.9%). 4.25% of AL cases had implant failure due to implant-related infection during the first year after the index revision arthroplasty, only the cases with early failure maintained high D-dimer levels. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 10 p. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | es_ES |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | BMC Infectious Diseases, 2022, 22,91 | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Plasma D-dimer | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Prosthetic joint infection | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | PJI guidelines | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | First-line screening test | es_ES |
dc.title | The poor accuracy of D-dimer for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection but its potential usefulness in early postoperative infections following revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherVersion | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07060-8 | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.DOI | 10.1186/s12879-022-07060-8 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | es_ES |