Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorFernández Sampedro, Marta es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSanlés-González, Iriaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Ibarbia, C.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorFañanás-Rodriquez, N.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorFakkas-Fernández, M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorFariñas Álvarez, María del Carmen es_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-05T18:26:47Z
dc.date.available2023-04-05T18:26:47Z
dc.date.issued2022es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1471-2334es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/28483
dc.description.abstractBackground: D-dimer was introduced in 2018 as an alternative biomarker for C-reactive protein (CRP) in the diagnostic of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. We assessed the accuracy of plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of early, delayed, and late PJI according to Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria, and whether persistently high levels of D-dimer in cases of aseptic loosening (AL) may be predictive of subsequent implant-related infection. Methods: A prospective study of a consecutive series of 187 revision arthroplasties was performed at a single institution.Septic (n = 39) and aseptic revisions (n = 141) were classified based on IDSA criteria. Preoperative assessment of CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and D-dimer was performed. Receiver operating curves were used to determine maximum sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers. The natural progress of D-dimer for AL cases was followed up either until the date of implant-related infection at any time during the first year or 1 year after revision in patients without failure. Clinical outcomes for those AL cases included infection-related failure that required a new surgery or need for antibiotic suppression. Results: Preoperative D-dimer level was significantly higher in PJI cases than in AL cases (p = 0.000). The optimal threshold of D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI was 1167 ng/mL. For overall diagnosis of PJI, C-reactive protein (CRP) achieved the highest sensitivity (84.6%), followed by erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and D-dimer (82% and 71.8%, respectively). Plasma D-dimer sensitivity was lower for all PJI types. When combinations of 2 tests were studied, the combined use of ESR and CRP achieved the best accuracy for all types of PJI (76.9%). 4.25% of AL cases had implant failure due to implant-related infection during the first year after the index revision arthroplasty, only the cases with early failure maintained high D-dimer levels.es_ES
dc.format.extent10 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Centrales_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceBMC Infectious Diseases, 2022, 22,91es_ES
dc.subject.otherPlasma D-dimeres_ES
dc.subject.otherProsthetic joint infectiones_ES
dc.subject.otherPJI guidelineses_ES
dc.subject.otherFirst-line screening testes_ES
dc.titleThe poor accuracy of D-dimer for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection but its potential usefulness in early postoperative infections following revision arthroplasty for aseptic looseninges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07060-8es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1186/s12879-022-07060-8es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International