Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorRábago Gómez, Daniel 
dc.contributor.authorQuindós Poncela, Luis Santiago 
dc.contributor.authorVargas, Arturo
dc.contributor.authorSainz Fernández, Carlos 
dc.contributor.authorRadulescu, Ileana
dc.contributor.authorIoan, Mihail-Razvan
dc.contributor.authorCardellini, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorCapogni, Marco
dc.contributor.authorRizzo, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorCelaya Gonzalez, Santiago 
dc.contributor.authorFuente Merino, Ismael 
dc.contributor.authorFuente, Marta
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, Maria
dc.contributor.authorGrossi, Claudia
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T16:13:36Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T16:13:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/28196
dc.description.abstractInterlaboratory exercises are a good tool to compare the response of different systems to the same quantity and to identify possible inconsistencies between them. One of the main goals of the EMPIR 19ENV01 traceRadon project is to harmonize radon flux measurements based on different systems and methodologies. In the framework of the traceRadon Project, two radon flux intercomparison campaigns were carried out in October 2021 at high and at low radon source areas. Four institutions participated in the field intercomparison exercises with their own systems. Every system was based on a specific radon monitor (diffusion or pump mode) and an accumulation chamber (with manual or automatic opening). Radon fluxes were calculated by each participant using both exponential and linear fittings of the radon activity concentration measured over time within the accumulation chambers. The results of this study show mainly: (i) the exponential approach is not advisable due to the variability of the radon flux and the leakage of the systems during long-time measurements; (ii) the linear approach should be applied to minimize the measurement period in agreement with the time response and sensitivity of the monitors; (iii) radon flux measured at high radon source areas (radium content of about 800 Bq kg-¹) risks being underestimated because of the influence of dvective effects; (iv) radon flux measured at low radon source areas (radium content of about 30 Bq kg-¹) may present large uncertainties if sensitive radon monitors with pump mode are not used.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding: This project 19ENV01 traceRadon has received funding from the EMPIR programme co-financed by the Participating States and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. 19ENV01 traceRadon denotes the EMPIR project reference.es_ES
dc.format.extent20 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceInt. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2022, 19(7), 4213es_ES
dc.subject.otherExhalationes_ES
dc.subject.otherTraceRadones_ES
dc.subject.otherProficiency testes_ES
dc.subject.otherInterlaboratory comparisones_ES
dc.titleIntercomparison of radon flux monitors at low and at high radium content areas under field conditionses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074213es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.3390/ijerph19074213
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International