dc.contributor.author | Tetteh, Harrison | |
dc.contributor.author | Bala Gala, Alba | |
dc.contributor.author | Fullana i Palmer, Pere | |
dc.contributor.author | Balcells Fluvià, Mercè | |
dc.contributor.author | Margallo Blanco, María | |
dc.contributor.author | Aldaco García, Rubén | |
dc.contributor.author | Puig Vidal, Rita | |
dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Cantabria | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-07T17:11:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-07T17:11:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-11-18 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2304-8158 | |
dc.identifier.other | PID2019-104925RB-C32 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10902/28051 | |
dc.description.abstract | Despite its relatively low environmental impact within the livestock sector, the poultry sector still faces its own environmental challenges that need to be addressed. The present paper uses life cycle assessment to quantify greenhouse gas emissions, from cradle to slaughterhouse gate, of four chicken meat products: whole carcass, wings, breast fillets, and leg quarters. The main contribution of the present study is that it provides a detailed analysis of different chicken meat cuts, testing mass and economic allocation choices and showing that economic allocation better reflects the causality of the cutting process. We recommend that a distinction should be made between whole carcass and meat cuts, as there are significant differences in meat content and climate change results between these two categories. This is not so clear in the literature, nor in the LEAP guideline for the poultry sector. The study was performed by using disaggregated inventory data from Spain, for the first time. Results show that the major contributors to environmental impact are feed production (>70%), electricity use (10.2%), and fossil fuel combustion (8.1%). Packaging did not significantly contribute to the climate change impact of the chicken products evaluated (0.4-3.4% contribution, depending on the type of packaging and product considered). | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation to the project KAIROS-BIOCIR (PID2019-104925RB-C32). The first author also appreciates the support (2021FI_B 00100) from the Secretariat for Universities and Research of the Ministry of Business and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia and the European Social Fund. Finally, the authors are grateful to Grupo SADA p.a., S.A for their support in this study. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 18 p. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
dc.rights | © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution ( CC BY) license. | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | Foods, 2022, 11(22), 3712 | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Life cycle assessment | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Greenhouse gas emissions | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Poultry meat | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Whole carcass and meat cuts | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Allocation to meat cuts | es_ES |
dc.title | Carbon footprint: the case of four chicken meat products sold on the Spanish market | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.DOI | 10.3390/foods11223712 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | es_ES |