Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorBouhzam, Ibtissam
dc.contributor.authorCantero Gómez, Rosa
dc.contributor.authorBalcells Fluvià, Mercè
dc.contributor.authorMargallo Blanco, María 
dc.contributor.authorAldaco García, Rubén 
dc.contributor.authorBala Gala, Alba
dc.contributor.authorFullana i Palmer, Pere
dc.contributor.authorPuig Vidal, Rita
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-07T17:08:33Z
dc.date.available2023-03-07T17:08:33Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-10
dc.identifier.issn2304-8158
dc.identifier.otherPID2019-104925RB-C32es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/28050
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to provide an overview of different extraction methods to obtain chlorogenic acid (CA) and caffeine (Caf) from spent coffee grounds (SCG). This overview shows that the quantity extracted is highly dependent on the type of SCG, so experiments using the same SCG are needed to compare different methods. Three easy and simple extraction methods will be tested at a laboratory scale and environmentally compared. All three experiments were of 1 min duration: first, using supramolecular solvent; second, with water and vortex; and third, with water assisted by ultrasound. Water extraction assisted by ultrasound at room temperature yielded the greatest quantity of chlorogenic acid and caffeine, with 1.15 mg CA/g and 0.972 mg Caf/g, respectively. Extraction using supra-solvent leads to a lower content of CA in the supra-phase since it has more affinity for the water-based inferior phase. An environmental assessment using life cycle assessment has been carried out to compare water and supra extraction methods for the manufacture of two different commercial products: a face cream and an eye contour serum. Results show that the type of solvent and the amount of active substance extracted have a great influence on the environmental results. The results presented here are important for companies willing to obtain these active substances at an industrial scale.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors wish to acknowledge the financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation to the project KAIROS-BIOCIR (PID2019-104925RB-C32). The first author also appreciates the support (2021FI SDUR 00130) from the Secretariat for Universities and Research of the Ministry of Business and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia and the European Social Fund.es_ES
dc.format.extent19 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rights© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution ( CC BY) license.es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceFoods, 2023, 12(4), 779es_ES
dc.subject.otherLife cycle assessmentes_ES
dc.subject.otherSupra solvents methodes_ES
dc.subject.otherWater extractiones_ES
dc.subject.otherSpent coffee grounds circularityes_ES
dc.titleEnvironmental and yield comparison of quick extraction methods for caffeine and chlorogenic acid from spent coffee groundses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.3390/foods12040779
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution ( CC BY) license.Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution ( CC BY) license.