Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorHaug, Tora Rydtunes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMiskovic, Daniloes_ES
dc.contributor.authorØrntoft, Mai-Britt Wormes_ES
dc.contributor.authorIversen, Lene Hjerrildes_ES
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Søren Paaskees_ES
dc.contributor.authorValentin, Jan Brinkes_ES
dc.contributor.authorGómez Ruiz, Marcos es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBenz, Stefanes_ES
dc.contributor.authorStorli, Kristian Eeges_ES
dc.contributor.authorStearns, Adam Tes_ES
dc.contributor.authorBrigic, Adelaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMadsen, Anders Hustedes_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T17:13:27Z
dc.date.available2023-02-22T17:13:27Z
dc.date.issued2023es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1462-8910es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1463-1318es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/27781
dc.description.abstractAim: To (1) develop an assessment tool for laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (LCME) and (2) report evidence of its content validity. Method: Assessment statements were revealed through (1) semi-structured expert interviews and (2) consensus by the Delphi method, both involving an expert panel of five LCME surgeons. All experts were interviewed and then asked to rate LCME describing statements from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Responses were returned anonymously to the panel until consensus was reached. Statements were directly included as content in the assessment tool if ?60% of the experts responded "agree" or "strongly agree" (ratings 4 and 5), with the remaining responses being "neither agree nor disagree" (rating 3). Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for expert agreement evaluation. All included statements were subsequently reformulated as tool items and approved by the experts. Results: Four Delphi rounds were performed to reach consensus. Disagreement was reported for statements describing instrument handling around pancreas; visualisation of landmarks before inferior mesenteric artery ligation; lymphadenectomy around the inferior mesenteric artery, and division of the terminal ileum and transverse colon. ICC in the last Delphi-round was 0.84. The final tool content included 73 statements, converted to 48 right- and 40 left-sided items for LCME assessment. Conclusion: A procedure-specific, video-based tool, named complete mesocolic excision competency assessment tool (CMECAT), has been developed for LCME skill assessment. In the future, we hope it can facilitate assessment of LCME surgeons, resulting in improved patient outcome after colon cancer surgery.es_ES
dc.format.extent13 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwelles_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Irelandes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceColorectal Disease, 2023, 25(1), 31-43es_ES
dc.subject.otherAssessment tooles_ES
dc.subject.otherColorectal surgeryes_ES
dc.subject.otherCompetencyes_ES
dc.subject.otherDelphi techniquees_ES
dc.subject.otherLaparoscopyes_ES
dc.subject.otherTechnical skillses_ES
dc.titleDevelopment of a procedure-specific tool for skill assessment in left- and right-sided laparoscopic complete mesocolic excisiones_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1111/codi.16317es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International