Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorGarrido-Sánchez, Lucíaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Revuelta, Marcoses_ES
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz-García de la Foz, Víctores_ES
dc.contributor.authorPelayo-Terán, José Maríaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorJuncal-Ruiz, Maríaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Veguilla, Migueles_ES
dc.contributor.authorMayoral-Van Son, Jacquelinees_ES
dc.contributor.authorAyesa Arriola, Rosa es_ES
dc.contributor.authorVázquez Bourgon, Javier es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCrespo Facorro, Benedicto es_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-16T19:32:01Z
dc.date.available2023-01-16T19:32:01Z
dc.date.issued2022es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1461-1457es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1469-5111es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/27234
dc.description.abstractBackground: Antipsychotic choice for the acute phase of a first episode of psychosis (FEP) is of the utmost importance since it may influence long-term outcome. However, head-to-head comparisons between second-generation antipsychotics remain scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness in the short term of aripiprazole and risperidone after FEP outbreak. Methods: From February 2011 to October 2018, a prospective, randomized, open-label study was undertaken. Two hundred-sixty-six first-episode drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (n = 136) or risperidone (n = 130) and followed-up for 12 weeks. The primary effectiveness measure was all-cause treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted to assess clinical efficacy. Results: The overall dropout rate at 12 weeks was small (6.39%). Effectiveness measures were similar between treatment arms as treatment discontinuation rates (? 2 = 0,409; P = .522), and mean time to all-cause discontinuation (log rank ? 2 = -1.009; P = .316) showed no statistically significant differences. Despite no statistically significant differences between groups regarding clinical efficacy, aripiprazole required higher chlorpromazine equivalent dosage (? 2 = 2.160; P = .032) and extended mean time (W = 8183.5; P = .008) to reach clinical response. Sex-related adverse events and rigidity were more frequent in the risperidone group, whereas sialorrhea was on the aripiprazole group. Conclusions: No differences regarding effectiveness were found between aripiprazole and risperidone for the short-phase treatment of FEP. Despite the importance of efficacy during this phase, differences in side effect profiles and patient's preferences are essential factors that may lead clinical decisions for these patients.es_ES
dc.format.extent12 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.sourceInt J Neuropsychopharmacol . 2022 Nov 17;25(11):900-911es_ES
dc.subject.otherAntipsychoticses_ES
dc.subject.otherFirst-episode-psychosises_ES
dc.subject.otherSchizophreniaes_ES
dc.subject.otherDrug-naïvees_ES
dc.subject.otherEffectivenesses_ES
dc.titleAripiprazole vs Risperidone Head-to-Head Effectiveness in First-Episode Non-Affective-Psychosis: A 3-Month Randomized, Flexible-Dose, Open-Label Clinical Triales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyac047es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1093/ijnp/pyac047es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International