Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorSantos Terán, Jorge 
dc.contributor.authorCifrián Bemposta, Eva 
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Romero, Araceli
dc.contributor.authorYoris Nóbile, Adrián Isidro 
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Fernández, Elena 
dc.contributor.authorCastro Fresno, Daniel 
dc.contributor.authorAndrés Payán, Ana 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-16T08:51:17Z
dc.date.available2022-11-16T08:51:17Z
dc.date.issued2023-01
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535
dc.identifier.issn1879-1298
dc.identifier.otherRTI2018-097612-B-C22es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/26464
dc.description.abstractEcotoxicological analysis of construction products is a relatively unexplored area at international level. Aquatic toxicity tests on construction products has been recommended recently for freshwater environment. However, the biological effects of alternative materials on marine ecosystem are still not considered. In this study, the main aim was to assess the environmental impact of alternative mortars proposed as artificial reefs (ARs) materials. The ARs specimens were developed by 3D printing, based on cement and geopolymer mortars using recycled sands of glass and seashells. For this purpose, a leaching test and two different toxicity bioassays, luminosity reduction of marine bacteria Vibrio fischeri (Microtox®) and the success of embryo-larval development of sea-urchin Paracentrotus lividus, were conducted. From the leaching results it should be noted that the mobility of all trace elements considered in both, raw materials and mortars, meet the inert landfill limits, except As, Mo, Se or Sb in the leachates geopolymer mortars. However, the results obtained from the both bioassays show low environmental acceptability for those mortars containing shell sand, probably due to the degradation of the organic matter adhered to the shells. On the other hand, cement mortars obtain better results than geopolymer mortars, regardless of the aggregate used, showing certain consistency with the leaching behaviour, since they present the lowest mobility of trace chemical elements. Therefore, the results supporting the environmental acceptability of its potential use as alternative materials in the production of ARs.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been supported by a) the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund by means of the research project RTI 2018-097612-B-C22.es_ES
dc.format.extent10 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceChemosphere, 2023, 310, 136773es_ES
dc.subject.otherMortarses_ES
dc.subject.otherCementes_ES
dc.subject.otherGeopolymeres_ES
dc.subject.otherBioassayses_ES
dc.subject.otherLeachinges_ES
dc.titleAssessment of the environmental acceptability of potential artificial reef materials using two ecotoxicity tests: Luminescent bacteria and sea urchin embryogenesises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136773es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136773
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International