Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez González, Ana
dc.contributor.authorUggetti, Enrica
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Lydia
dc.contributor.authorGorchs, Gil
dc.contributor.authorFerrer, Ivet
dc.contributor.authorDíez Montero, Rubén 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T17:18:43Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T17:18:43Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.identifier.otherCYRCLE - PID2020-113866RA-I00es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/26360
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: Alternatives to conventional inorganic fertilizers are needed to cope with the growing global population and contamination due to the production and use of those inorganic compounds. The recovery of nutrients from wastewater and organic wastes is a promising option to provide fertilization in a circular economy approach. In this context, microalgae-based systems are an alternative to conventional wastewater treatment systems, reducing the treatment costs and improving the sustainability of the process, while producing nutrient-rich microalgal biomass. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the use of microalgal biomass produced during domestic wastewater treatment in high rate algal ponds as a biofertilizer in basil crops (Ocimum basilicum L.). Wastewater was successfully treated, with removal efficiencies in the secondary treatment of 69, 91 and 81% in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) and phosphates (PO4 3–P), respectively. The microalgal biomass, composed mainly by Scenedesmus, presented the following composition: 12% of dry weight and nutrients concentration of 7.6% nitrogen (N), 1.6% phosphorus (P) and 0.9% potassium (K). The study compared the performance of 3 different fertilizers: 1) microalgae fertilizer (MF), 2) inorganic fertilizer (IF) as positive control and 3) the combination of both microalgae and inorganic fertilizer (MF + IF). Comparable plant growth (i.e., number of leaves, shoot fresh and dry weight and leaf fresh weight) was observed among treatments, except for leaf dry weight, which was significantly higher in the IF + MF and MF treatments (28 and 27%, respectively) in comparison with the control. However, the microalgae treatment provided the lowest chlorophyll, N and K leaf content. In conclusion, this study suggests that combining microalgae grown in wastewater with an inorganic fertilizer is a promising nutrients source for basil crops, enhancing the circular bioeconomy.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the European Commission (FERTILWASTES-EFA307/19) and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (CYRCLE - PID2020-113866RA-I00). E. Uggetti and R. Díez-Montero would like to thank the Spanish Ministry of Industry and Economy for their research grants [RYC2018-025514 and IJC2019-042069-I, respectively].es_ES
dc.format.extent8 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.sourceJournal of Environmental Management, 2022, 323, 116224es_ES
dc.subject.otherWateres_ES
dc.subject.otherBiofertilizeres_ES
dc.subject.otherAlgal biomasses_ES
dc.subject.otherCircular bioeconomyes_ES
dc.subject.otherAgronomic testses_ES
dc.subject.otherResource recoveryes_ES
dc.titleCan microalgae grown in wastewater reduce the use of inorganic fertilizers?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116224es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116224


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International