Clinical Features and Outcomes of Streptococcus anginosus Group Infective Endocarditis: A Multicenter Matched Cohort Study
Ver/ Abrir
Registro completo
Mostrar el registro completo DCAutoría
Escrihuela-Vidal, Francesc; López-Cortés, Luis Eduardo; Escolà-Vergé, Laura; Alarcón González, Arístides de; Cuervo, Guillermo; Sánchez-Porto, Antonio; Fernández-Hidalgo, Nuria; Luque, Rafael; Montejo, Miguel; Miró, José María; Goenaga, Miguel Ángel; Muñoz, Patricia; Valerio, Maricela; Ripa, Marco; Sousa-Regueiro, Dolores; Gurguí, Mercé; Fariñas Álvarez, María del Carmen
Fecha
2021-03-29Derechos
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Publicado en
Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 8, Issue 6, June 2021, ofab163
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Enlace a la publicación
Palabras clave
Infective endocarditis
Streptococcus anginosus
Viridans group streptococci
Streptococcus gallolyticus
Resumen/Abstract
Background. Although Streptococcus anginosus group (SAG) endocarditis is considered a severe disease associated with abscess formation and embolic events, there is limited evidence to support this assumption. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients with definite SAG endocarditis in 28 centers in Spain and Italy. A comparison between cases due to SAG endocarditis and viridans group streptococci (VGS) or Streptococcus gallolyticus group (SGG) was performed in a 1:2 matched analysis. Results. Of 5336 consecutive cases of definite endocarditis, 72 (1.4%) were due to SAG and matched with 144 cases due to VGS/ SGG. SAG endocarditis was community acquired in 64 (88.9%) cases and affected aortic native valve in 29 (40.3%). When com paring SAG and VGS/SGG endocarditis, no significant differences were found in septic shock (8.3% vs 3.5%, P = .116); valve disorder, including perforation (22.2% vs 18.1%, P = .584), pseudoaneurysm (16.7% vs 8.3%, P = .108), or prosthesis dehiscence (1.4% vs 6.3%, P = .170); paravalvular complications, including abscess (25% vs 18.8%, P = .264) and intracardiac fistula (5.6% vs 3.5%, P = .485); heart failure (34.7% vs 38.9%, P = .655); or embolic events (41.7% vs 32.6%, P = .248). Indications for surgery (70.8% vs 70.8%; P = 1) and mortality (13.9% vs 16.7%; P = .741) were similar between groups. Conclusions. SAG endocarditis is an infrequent but serious condition that presents a prognosis similar to that of VGS/SGG.
Colecciones a las que pertenece
- D22 Artículos [1134]