Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorMostaza, Jose María
dc.contributor.authorSuarez, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorCepeda, Jose María
dc.contributor.authorManzano, Luis
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, Demetrio
dc.contributor.authorPERFILAR study investigators
dc.contributor.authorHernández Hernández, José Luis 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-02T16:42:57Z
dc.date.available2022-03-02T16:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1471-2261
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/24104
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study assessed the sociodemographic, functional, and clinical determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) attended in the internal medicine setting. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in NVAF patients who attended internal medicine departments for either a routine visit (outpatients) or hospitalization (inpatients). Results: A total of 961 patients were evaluated. Their antithrombotic management included: no treatment (4.7%), vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (59.6%), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (21.6%), antiplatelets (6.6%), and antiplatelets plus anticoagulants (7.5%). Permanent NVAF and congestive heart failure were associated with preferential use of oral anticoagulation over antiplatelets, while intermediate-to high-mortality risk according to the PROFUND index was associated with a higher likelihood of using antiplatelet therapy instead of oral anticoagulation. Longer disease duration and institutionalization were identified as determinants of VKA use over DOACs. Female gender, higher education, and having suffered a stroke determined a preferential use of DOACs. Conclusions: This real-world study showed that most elderly NVAF patients received oral anticoagulation, mainly VKAs, while DOACs remained underused. Antiplatelets were still offered to a proportion of patients. Longer duration of NVAF and institutionalization were identified as determinants of VKA use over DOACs. A poor prognosis according to the PROFUND index was identified as a factor preventing the use of oral anticoagulation.es_ES
dc.format.extent12 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Centrales_ES
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2021.es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceBMC Cardiovasc Disord . 2021 Aug 9;21(1):384es_ES
dc.subject.otherAntithrombotic treatmentes_ES
dc.subject.otherDirect-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs)es_ES
dc.subject.otherNonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF)es_ES
dc.subject.otherVitamin K antagonists (VKAs)es_ES
dc.titleDemographic, clinical, and functional determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillationes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02019-0es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1186/s12872-021-02019-0
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© The Author(s) 2021.Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © The Author(s) 2021.