Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorIruzubieta, Paula
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Lanas, Tatiana
dc.contributor.authorRasines, Laura
dc.contributor.authorCayon, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez-Cancelo, Ana
dc.contributor.authorSantos Laso, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Blanco, Agustín
dc.contributor.authorCuriel-Olmo, Soraya
dc.contributor.authorCabezas, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorWallmann, Reinhard
dc.contributor.authorFábrega García, Emilio 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Taboada, Víctor Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorHernández Hernández, José Luis 
dc.contributor.authorLópez Hoyos, Marcos 
dc.contributor.authorLazarus, Jeffrey V
dc.contributor.authorCrespo García, Javier 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-14T19:40:12Z
dc.date.available2022-02-14T19:40:12Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/23953
dc.description.abstractThe simplicity and low cost of rapid point-of-care tests greatly facilitate large-scale population testing, which can contribute to controlling the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We evaluated the applicability of a self-testing strategy for SARS-CoV2 in a population-based, cross-sectional study in Cantabria, Spain, between April and May 2020. For the self-testing strategy, participants received the necessary material for the self-collection of blood and performance of a rapid antibody test using lateral flow immunoassay at home without the supervision of healthcare personnel. A total of 1,022 participants were enrolled. Most participants correctly performed the COVID-19 self-test the first time (91.3% [95% CI 89.4-92.9]). Only a minority of the participants (0.7%) needed the help of healthcare personnel, while 6.9% required a second kit delivery, for a total valid test result in 96.9% of the participants. Incorrect use of the self-test was not associated with the educational level, age over 65, or housing area. Prevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV2 for subjects with a valid rapid test result was 3.1% (95% CI 2.2-4.4), similar to the seroprevalence result obtained using a conventional approach carried out by healthcare professionals. In conclusion, COVID-19 self-testing should be considered as a screening tool.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipAcknowledgements: We would like to acknowledge the participation of all the individuals in this study. JVL acknowledges support to ISGlobal from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities through the “Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2019-2023” Programme (CEX2018-000806-S), and from the Government of Catalonia through the CERCA Programme.es_ES
dc.format.extent10 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceSci Rep . 2021 May 10;11(1):9819es_ES
dc.titleFeasibility of large-scale population testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection by self-testing at homees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://www.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89236-xes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1038/s41598-021-89236-x
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International